These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35232113)

  • 1. Relationship between irregularities in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions suppression and psychophysical tuning curves.
    Engler S; Gaudrain E; de Kleine E; van Dijk P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1055. PubMed ID: 35232113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the barn owl (Tyto alba).
    Engler S; Köppl C; Manley GA; de Kleine E; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 385():107835. PubMed ID: 31710933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, threshold microstructure, and psychophysical tuning over a wide frequency range in humans.
    Baiduc RR; Lee J; Dhar S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):300-14. PubMed ID: 24437770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of probe level on the tuning of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions and behavioral test in human.
    Wang Y; Gong Q; Zhang T
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 May; 15(1):51. PubMed ID: 27160830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency selectivity of tonal language native speakers probed by suppression tuning curves of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Engler S; de Kleine E; Avan P; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 398():108100. PubMed ID: 33125981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interrelations between psychoacoustical tuning curves and spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Micheyl C; Collet L
    Scand Audiol; 1994; 23(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 7997834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Manley GA; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():53-62. PubMed ID: 27139323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploration of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Charaziak KK; Souza PE; Siegel JH
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 25290042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C; Sininger YS; Ekelid M; Zeng FG
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):38-53. PubMed ID: 8880180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.
    Charaziak KK; Souza P; Siegel JH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Dec; 14(6):843-62. PubMed ID: 24013802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual consequences of the interactions between spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and external tones. I. Monaural diplacusis and aftertones.
    Long G
    Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 9641318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas.
    Charaziak KK; Siegel JH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 15(6):883-96. PubMed ID: 25230801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An objective assessment method for frequency selectivity of the human auditory system.
    Gong Q; Wang Y; Xian M
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Dec; 13():171. PubMed ID: 25522838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of reversible noise exposure on the suppression tuning of rabbit distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Howard MA; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):285-96. PubMed ID: 11831802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of spontaneous otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curve measures.
    Zizz CA; Glattke TJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):616-9. PubMed ID: 3230891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual Differences in Behavioural Decision Weights Related to Irregularities in Cochlear Mechanics.
    Lee J; Heo I; Chang AC; Bond K; Stoelinga C; Lutfi R; Long G
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():457-465. PubMed ID: 27080687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association between Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emission and Psychoacoustic measures.
    Kumar K; John J; Ravi R
    Int Tinnitus J; 2021 Jan; 24(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 33496417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions in
    Cheatham MA; Zhou Y; Goodyear RJ; Dallos P; Richardson GP
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 30627650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.
    Charaziak KK; Siegel JH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Jun; 16(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 25813430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves.
    Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):244-62. PubMed ID: 12880039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.