These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35232113)

  • 21. Effect of Musical Experience on Cochlear Frequency Resolution: An Estimation of PTCs, DLF and SOAEs.
    Kakar K; Bhat JP; Thontadarya S
    J Int Adv Otol; 2021 Jul; 17(4):313-318. PubMed ID: 34309551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Difference between frequency and suppression tuning curves in a two-dimensional cochlear model.
    Murakami Y; Fuji T
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Sep; 2(9):094402. PubMed ID: 36182343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission two-tone suppression in humans.
    Rasetshwane DM; Bosen EC; Kopun JG; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Dec; 146(6):4481. PubMed ID: 31893726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: frequency modulation.
    Bian L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3009-21. PubMed ID: 19045788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions created through the interaction of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and externally generated tones.
    Norrix LW; Glattke TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):945-55. PubMed ID: 8759948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Harrison WA; Burns EM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2649-58. PubMed ID: 8270741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Carbamazepine induces upward frequency shifts of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    de Kleine E; Maat B; Metzemaekers JD; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2022 Jul; 420():108492. PubMed ID: 35395509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of loop diuretics on the suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):972-83. PubMed ID: 9714917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Suppression tuning curves for spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in infants and adults.
    Bargones JY; Burns EM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 May; 83(5):1809-16. PubMed ID: 3403795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: amplitude modulation.
    Bian L; Watts KL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):887-98. PubMed ID: 18247892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.
    Dewey JB; Lee J; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 15(6):897-914. PubMed ID: 25245498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Maturation of the human cochlear amplifier: distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves recorded at low and high primary tone levels.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1465-76. PubMed ID: 11572357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The shape of 2f1-f2 suppression tuning curves reflects basilar membrane specializations in the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii.
    Frank G; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 1995 Mar; 83(1-2):151-60. PubMed ID: 7607981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Characterizing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions across the human lifespan.
    Abdala C; Luo P; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1874. PubMed ID: 28372113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Suppression tuning in noise-exposed rabbits.
    Howard MA; Stagner BB; Foster PK; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):279-93. PubMed ID: 12880041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing spontaneous and stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions in mice with tectorial membrane defects.
    Cheatham MA
    Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 400():108143. PubMed ID: 33340968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Psychoacoustic analyses of cochlear mechanisms in tinnitus patients with normal auditory thresholds.
    Buzo BC; Carvallo RM
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 24168288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlated amplitude fluctuations of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    van Dijk P; Wit HP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):336-43. PubMed ID: 9670526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Changes in human spontaneous otoacoustic emissions with contralateral acoustic stimulation].
    Kashiwamura M; Satoh N; Fukuda S; Kawanami M; Chida E; Inuyama Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1993 Jun; 96(6):922-30. PubMed ID: 8345399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relaxation dynamics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions perturbed by external tones. II. Suppression of interacting emissions.
    Murphy WJ; Tubis A; Talmadge CL; Long GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3711-20. PubMed ID: 7790650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.