These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35232531)
21. Evaluation of a resin modified glass ionomer serving both as indirect pulp therapy and as restorative material for primary molars. Kotsanos N; Arizos S Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2011 Jun; 12(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 21640064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The preventive effect of glass ionomer restorations on new caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ge KX; Quock R; Chu CH; Yu OY J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104272. PubMed ID: 36038075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Use of bulk fill resin composite and universal adhesive for restoring primary teeth after selective carious tissue removal to soft dentin: A randomized clinical trial. Massa MG; Trentin GA; Noal FC; Franzon R; Lenzi TL; de Araujo FB Am J Dent; 2022 Apr; 35(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 35506965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Esthetic restorative options for pulpotomized primary molars: a review of literature. Guelmann M; Shapira J; Silva DR; Fuks AB J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 36(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 22524071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation and comparison of silorane resin composite to glass ionomer in occluso-proximal restorations of primary molars: A randomized controlled trial. Maru VP; Kulkarni P; Chauhan R; Bapat SS J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2022; 40(3):281-287. PubMed ID: 36260469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth: a systematic review. Amend S; Boutsiouki C; Bekes K; Kloukos D; Gizani S; Lygidakis NN; Frankenberger R; Krämer N Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2022 Oct; 23(5):761-776. PubMed ID: 36056991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Two-year clinical evaluation of three restorative materials in primary molars. Daou MH; Tavernier B; Meyer JM J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009; 34(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 19953810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars. Papathanasiou AG; Curzon ME; Fairpo CG Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 7937261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials. Guelmann M; McIlwain MF; Primosch RE Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 15839391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Eighteen-month clinical performance of composite resin restorations with two different adhesive systems for molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralization. de Souza JF; Fragelli CB; Jeremias F; Paschoal MAB; Santos-Pinto L; de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1725-1733. PubMed ID: 27743215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation. Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial. Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vivo study of the behavior of glass ionomer restorations in patients with special needs. Grau-Benítez M; Silvestre FJ; Pascual A; Albero A; Silvestre-Rangil J Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2024 Jul; 29(4):e559-e567. PubMed ID: 38907639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations. Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical evaluation of three restorative materials applied in a minimal intervention caries treatment approach. Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Barbosa SH; Lauris JR; Franco EB J Public Health Dent; 2003; 63(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 14682645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A randomized trial of resin-based restorations in class I and class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 24-month results. dos Santos MP; Passos M; Luiz RR; Maia LC J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):156-66; quiz 247-8. PubMed ID: 19188412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Observational: prospective study of indirect pulp treatment in primary molars using resin-modified glass ionomer and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate: a 12-month Follow-up. Rosenberg L; Atar M; Daronch M; Honig A; Chey M; Funny MD; Cruz L Pediatr Dent; 2013; 35(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 23635886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Conservative approach for molar-incisor hypomineralization: a case report and 7-year follow-up. Pessôa CP; Pion L; Reyes A; Matos R; Alencar CF; Novaes TF; Braga MM Gen Dent; 2018; 66(3):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 29714706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition. Varpio M Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]