172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35232673)
21. Oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation in women with ovarian endometriosis.
Kim SJ; Kim SK; Lee JR; Suh CS; Kim SH
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Jun; 40(6):827-834. PubMed ID: 32295746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Knowledge and decision making about future fertility and oocyte cryopreservation among young women.
Stevenson EL; Gispanski L; Fields K; Cappadora M; Hurt M
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2021 Apr; 24(2):112-121. PubMed ID: 30623694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility?
Hodes-Wertz B; Druckenmiller S; Smith M; Noyes N
Fertil Steril; 2013 Nov; 100(5):1343-9. PubMed ID: 23953326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Childless women's beliefs and knowledge about oocyte freezing for social and medical reasons.
Daniluk JC; Koert E
Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2313-20. PubMed ID: 27591238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Awareness of fertility and reproductive aging in women seeking oocyte cryopreservation, reproductive aged controls, and female health care professionals: A comparative study.
Dundar Akın O; Boza A; Yakin K; Urman B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Feb; 233():146-150. PubMed ID: 30597339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Increasing awareness of age-related fertility and elective fertility preservation among medical students and house staff: a pre- and post-intervention analysis.
Anspach Will E; Maslow BS; Kaye L; Nulsen J
Fertil Steril; 2017 May; 107(5):1200-1205.e1. PubMed ID: 28392003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pregnancy and Fertility Concerns: A Survey of United States Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents.
Schwartz KM; Martin CE; Hipp HS; Kawwass JF
Matern Child Health J; 2021 Jan; 25(1):172-179. PubMed ID: 33242208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Attitude towards ovarian tissue and oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons: a cross-sectional study.
Woodtli N; von Wolff M; Bitterlich N; Stute P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jul; 298(1):191-198. PubMed ID: 29700601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Random Start Ovarian Stimulation for Oocyte or Embryo Cryopreservation in Women Desiring Fertility Preservation Prior to Gonadotoxic Cancer Therapy.
Danis RB; Pereira N; Elias RT
Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 18(8):609-613. PubMed ID: 28786354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Social oocyte cryopreservation: a portrayal of Brazilian women.
Santo EVE; Dieamant F; Petersen CG; Mauri AL; Vagnini LD; Renzi A; Zamara C; Oliveira JBA; Baruffi RLR; Franco JG
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2017 Jun; 21(2):101-104. PubMed ID: 28609276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of infertility, fertility assessment, and assisted reproductive technologies in the era of oocyte freezing among female and male university students.
Meissner C; Schippert C; von Versen-Höynck F
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 27125212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Parenthood desire, childbearing plans and oocyte utilization among women who previously underwent planned oocyte cryopreservation.
Yee S; Goodman CV; Fu V; Lipton NJ; Librach CL
Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Feb; 42(2):442-450. PubMed ID: 33246804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Planned Oocyte Cryopreservation: Outcomes, Motivations, and Involvement of Primary Health Care Providers.
Yee S; Lipton NJ; Fu V; Goodman CV; Librach C
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2022 Feb; 31(2):285-292. PubMed ID: 34030468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Acceptance and willingness-to-pay for oocyte cryopreservation in medical versus age-related fertility preservation scenarios among Swedish female university students.
Gambadauro P; Bränn E; Hadlaczky G
Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):5325. PubMed ID: 37005458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Opinions of female academicians on oocyte freezing: a qualitative study.
Tandoğan Ö; Kugcumen G; Satılmış İG
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2023; 69(7):e20230221. PubMed ID: 37466604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Medical and social egg freezing: internet-based survey of knowledge and attitudes among women in Denmark and the UK.
Lallemant C; Vassard D; Nyboe Andersen A; Schmidt L; Macklon N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Dec; 95(12):1402-1410. PubMed ID: 27638056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers.
Stoop D; Maes E; Polyzos NP; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; Nekkebroeck J
Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 25432922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical and elective fertility preservation: impact of removal of the experimental label from oocyte cryopreservation.
Schon SB; Shapiro M; Gracia C; Senapati S
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Sep; 34(9):1207-1215. PubMed ID: 28656539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Update on fertility preservation from the Barcelona International Society for Fertility Preservation-ESHRE-ASRM 2015 expert meeting: indications, results and future perspectives.
Martinez F
Hum Reprod; 2017 Sep; 32(9):1802-1811. PubMed ID: 29117320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fertility preservation using controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and oocyte cryopreservation in a premenarcheal female with myelodysplastic syndrome.
Reichman DE; Davis OK; Zaninovic N; Rosenwaks Z; Goldschlag DE
Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov; 98(5):1225-8. PubMed ID: 22884018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
