These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3523283)

  • 1. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries. Special reference to contrast media.
    Nakstad P; Bakke SJ; Kjartansson O; Nyhus S
    Neuroradiology; 1986; 28(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 3523283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries. A comparison of iohexol and metrizoate.
    Nakstad P
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():89-93. PubMed ID: 6382941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative double-blind investigation of meglumine metrizoate, metrizamide, and iohexol in carotid angiography.
    Hindmarsh T; Bergstrand G; Ericson K; Olivecrona H
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):347-9. PubMed ID: 6410741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cerebral angiography with the non-ionic water-soluble contrast medium iohexol and meglumine-Ca-metrizoate. A randomized double blind parallel study in man.
    Nakstad P; Sortland O; Aaserud O; Lundervold A
    Neuroradiology; 1982; 23(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 7121809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol.
    Cacayorin ED; Bernstein AD; Fruehan CT; Lee SH; Kieffer SA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 6410736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complications in cerebral angiography. A comparison between the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol and meglumine metrizoate (Isopaque Cerebral).
    Skalpe IO; Anke IM
    Neuroradiology; 1983; 25(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 6350922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Iohexol compared to meglumine-Ca-metrizoate in common carotid angiography. A randomized double blind cross-over study in man.
    Nakstad P; Sortland O; Aaserud O
    Neuroradiology; 1983; 25(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 6856079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Kieffer SA
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():81-4. PubMed ID: 6382939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with isotonic dimeric (iodixanol) and monomeric (iohexol) nonionic contrast media: radiographic, clinical and neurophysiological evaluation.
    Hekster RE; Morré HH; Cleyndert P; Zapletal J; Sinnige LF; Bolstad B; Keetlapper Y
    Neuroradiology; 1995 Jan; 37(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 7708189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Omnipaque vs. Hexabrix in intravenous DSA of the carotid arteries: randomized double-blind crossover study.
    Nakstad PH; Bakke SJ; Kjartansson O; von Krogh J
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1986; 7(2):303-4. PubMed ID: 3082163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploration of the cervico-cerebral vessels by intravenous digital subtraction angiography. A review based on 405 examinations.
    Debaene A; Lavieille J; Stanoyevitch JF; Legré J
    J Neuroradiol; 1984; 11(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 6384437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital angiography: introducing digital techniques to clinical cerebral angiography practice.
    Forbes GS; Earnest F; Kispert DB; Folger WN; Sundt TM
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1982 Nov; 57(11):683-93. PubMed ID: 6752591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Iohexol compared to urografin meglumine in cerebral angiography. A randomized, double blind cross-over study.
    Ahlgren P
    Neuroradiology; 1982; 23(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 7121808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intravenous angiography of the extracranial cerebral arteries.
    Ducos de Lahitte M; Marc-Vergnes JP; Rascol A; Guiraud B; Manelfe C
    Radiology; 1980 Dec; 137(3):705-11. PubMed ID: 7003649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital subtraction angiography.
    Johnson CM; Sheedy PF; Earnest F; Stanson AW
    Surg Clin North Am; 1984 Feb; 64(1):151-71. PubMed ID: 6367106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital subtraction angiography with intravenous injection: assessment of 1,000 carotid bifurcations.
    Wood GW; Lukin RR; Tomsick TA; Chambers AA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 May; 140(5):855-9. PubMed ID: 6601424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical testing of iohexol, conray meglumine and amipaque in cerebral angiography.
    Ingstrup HM; Hauge P
    Neuroradiology; 1982; 23(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 7043304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Moyamoya in sickle cell disease demonstrated by DSA and Hexabrix.
    Ramsewak W; Gill G; Lo R
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1985 Dec; 36(4):332-3. PubMed ID: 3910659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.