These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35233638)

  • 1. Editor's Choice: Modelling chance of pregnancy in the general population.
    Lambalk CN
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 37(3):e1. PubMed ID: 35233638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adolescent reproductive health. Editor's choice.
    Balen A; Creighton S; Martin-Hirsch P
    BJOG; 2010 Jan; 117(2):i. PubMed ID: 20002392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editor's choice: new debate.
    Van Steirteghem A
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Jul; 24(7):1531. PubMed ID: 19541700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Associate editor's commentary: mathematical modelling and clinical prediction.
    Collins JA
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Oct; 20(10):2932-4. PubMed ID: 15980001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editor's Choice. 19th World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics in Cape Town, South Africa.
    Steer P
    BJOG; 2009 Oct; 116(11):i-ii. PubMed ID: 19769748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human Reproduction. Editor's choice.
    Van Steirteghem A
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Mar; 24(3):495. PubMed ID: 19237737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What makes RBM Online special? The Chief Editor's point of view.
    Fauser BC
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2016 Nov; 33(5):535-536. PubMed ID: 27814835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Editor's Choice: Fertility after cancer, these are promising times.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Jul; 33(7):e1. PubMed ID: 29931144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Editor's opinion of the recent committee opinion of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine that the luteal phase deficiency as a clinical entity causing infertility has not been proven.
    Check JH
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2016; 43(4):479-483. PubMed ID: 29734530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating prediction models in reproductive medicine.
    Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Opmeer BC; Mol BW; Bossuyt PM
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Aug; 24(8):1774-8. PubMed ID: 19395365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Editor's choice. The problem with fetal monitoring.
    Marsh M
    BJOG; 2011 Jul; 118(8):i-ii. PubMed ID: 21658191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do clinical prediction models improve concordance of treatment decisions in reproductive medicine?
    van der Steeg JW; Steures P; Eijkemans MJ; Habbema JD; Bossuyt PM; Hompes PG; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    BJOG; 2006 Jul; 113(7):825-31. PubMed ID: 16827767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BJOG editor's choice: global obstetrics.
    Marsh M
    BJOG; 2013 Dec; 120(13):i-ii. PubMed ID: 24589009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ongoing pregnancy qualifies best as the primary outcome measure of choice in trials in reproductive medicine: an opinion paper.
    Braakhekke M; Kamphuis EI; Dancet EA; Mol F; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1203-4. PubMed ID: 24786739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness and safety as outcome measures in reproductive medicine.
    Braakhekke M; Kamphuis EI; Mol F; Norman RJ; Bhattacharya S; van der Veen F; Mol BW
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2249-51. PubMed ID: 26384402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Editor's Choice (August 1996).
    Croall J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Dec; 103(12):1272. PubMed ID: 8968256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Editor's workshop.
    Sanfilippo JS
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 25(1):1. PubMed ID: 22217651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are interventions in reproductive medicine assessed for plausible and clinically relevant effects? A systematic review of power and precision in trials and meta-analyses.
    Stocking K; Wilkinson J; Lensen S; Brison DR; Roberts SA; Vail A
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):659-665. PubMed ID: 30838395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Editor's choice: citation classics.
    Van Steirteghem A
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Jan; 25(1):1. PubMed ID: 20016023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Editor's Foreword.
    Cernada G
    Int Q Community Health Educ; 2007-2008; 28(4):275-6. PubMed ID: 19193522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.