These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35233702)

  • 1. Right ventricular and pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: an interventional study in coronary artery bypass surgery patients.
    Flick M; Sand U; Bergholz A; Kouz K; Reiter B; Flotzinger D; Saugel B; Kubitz JC
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Dec; 36(6):1817-1825. PubMed ID: 35233702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Yazigi A; Khoury E; Hlais S; Madi-Jebara S; Haddad F; Hayek G; Jabbour K
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Jun; 26(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 22100211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery.
    Solus-Biguenet H; Fleyfel M; Tavernier B; Kipnis E; Onimus J; Robin E; Lebuffe G; Decoene C; Pruvot FR; Vallet B
    Br J Anaesth; 2006 Dec; 97(6):808-16. PubMed ID: 16980709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pulse-pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness during heart displacement for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Lee JH; Jeon Y; Bahk JH; Gil NS; Kim KB; Hong DM; Kim HJ
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1056-62. PubMed ID: 21924634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pulse pressure variation is not a valid predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with elevated left ventricular filling pressure.
    Shim JK; Song JW; Song Y; Kim JH; Kang HM; Kwak YL
    J Crit Care; 2014 Dec; 29(6):987-91. PubMed ID: 25216949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in arterial blood pressure characteristics following an extrasystolic beat or a fast 50 ml fluid challenge do not predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac surgery.
    Berg JM; Nielsen DV; Abromaitiene V; Hjørnet NE; Vistisen ST
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Jun; 36(3):889-900. PubMed ID: 34041648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of tidal volume change on pressure-based prediction of fluid responsiveness in children.
    Ji SH; Jang YE; Park JB; Kang P; Cho SA; Kim EH; Lee JH; Kim HS; Kim JT
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2023 Nov; 33(11):930-937. PubMed ID: 37641455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature.
    Marik PE; Cavallazzi R; Vasu T; Hirani A
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Sep; 37(9):2642-7. PubMed ID: 19602972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing volume responsiveness using right ventricular dynamic indicators of preload.
    Graessler MF; Wodack KH; Pinnschmidt HO; Nishimoto S; Behem CR; Reuter DA; Trepte CJC
    J Anesth; 2021 Aug; 35(4):488-494. PubMed ID: 33950295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pulse-pressure variation and hemodynamic response in patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressure: a clinical study.
    Wyler von Ballmoos M; Takala J; Roeck M; Porta F; Tueller D; Ganter CC; Schröder R; Bracht H; Baenziger B; Jakob SM
    Crit Care; 2010; 14(3):R111. PubMed ID: 20540730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of responsiveness to an intravenous fluid challenge in patients after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a comparison between arterial pulse pressure variation and digital plethysmographic variability index.
    Fischer MO; Pelissier A; Bohadana D; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL; Fellahi JL
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1087-93. PubMed ID: 23992654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carotid doppler indices do not predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
    Khan S; Mishra SK; Parida S; Jha AK; Nagabhushanam Padala SRA
    J Card Surg; 2022 Dec; 37(12):4418-4424. PubMed ID: 36251251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemodynamic pressure waveform analysis in predicting fluid responsiveness.
    Roy S; Couture P; Qizilbash B; Toupin F; Levesque S; Carrier M; Lambert J; Denault AY
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Aug; 27(4):676-80. PubMed ID: 23849524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
    Reuter DA; Kirchner A; Felbinger TW; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
    Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1399-404. PubMed ID: 12771609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
    Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Different predictivity of fluid responsiveness by pulse pressure variation in children after surgical repair of ventricular septal defect or tetralogy of Fallot.
    Han D; Pan S; Wang X; Jia Q; Luo Y; Li J; Ou-Yang C
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2017 Oct; 27(10):1056-1063. PubMed ID: 28857356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation measured from a peripheral artery for accurately predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated dogs.
    Dalmagro TL; Teixeira-Neto FJ; Celeita-Rodríguez N; Garofalo NA; López-Castañeda B; Nascimento-Junior PD
    Vet Anaesth Analg; 2021 Jul; 48(4):501-508. PubMed ID: 34020897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of fluid-responsiveness parameters for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison among LiDCO, transesophageal echochardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter.
    Belloni L; Pisano A; Natale A; Piccirillo MR; Piazza L; Ismeno G; De Martino G
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Apr; 22(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 18375327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness Using Pulse Pressure Variation in Infants Undergoing Ventricular Septal Defect Repair with Median Sternotomy or Minimally Invasive Right Thoracotomy.
    Han D; Liu YG; Luo Y; Li J; Ou-Yang C
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 38(1):184-190. PubMed ID: 27837303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison Between Changes in Systolic-Pressure Variation and Pulse-Pressure Variation After Passive Leg Raising to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Postoperative Critically Ill Patients.
    Xie J; Xu L; Peng K; Chen J; Wan J
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2024 Feb; 38(2):459-465. PubMed ID: 38114373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.