These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35234562)

  • 1. A resource efficient and reliable standard setting method for OSCEs: Borderline regression method using standardized patients as sole raters in clinical case encounters with medical students.
    Milan FB; Grochowalski JH
    Med Teach; 2022 Aug; 44(8):878-885. PubMed ID: 35234562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing the cut score for the borderline group method and borderline regression method with norm-referenced standard setting in an objective structured clinical examination in medical school in Korea.
    Park SY; Lee SH; Kim MJ; Ji KH; Ryu JH
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():25. PubMed ID: 34565121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of global rating scales for OSCEs in veterinary medicine.
    Read EK; Bell C; Rhind S; Hecker KG
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121000. PubMed ID: 25822258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of the inclusion of simulated patient ratings on the reliability of OSCE assessments under the borderline regression method.
    Homer M; Pell G
    Med Teach; 2009 May; 31(5):420-5. PubMed ID: 19142798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical students review of formative OSCE scores, checklists, and videos improves with student-faculty debriefing meetings.
    Bernard AW; Ceccolini G; Feinn R; Rockfeld J; Rosenberg I; Thomas L; Cassese T
    Med Educ Online; 2017; 22(1):1324718. PubMed ID: 28521646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standard setting in OSCEs: a borderline approach.
    Rajiah K; Veettil SK; Kumar S
    Clin Teach; 2014 Dec; 11(7):551-6. PubMed ID: 25417986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing medical students' communication skills by the use of standardized patients: emphasizing standardized patients' quality assurance.
    Shirazi M; Labaf A; Monjazebi F; Jalili M; Mirzazadeh M; Ponzer S; Masiello I
    Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Jun; 38(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 24777713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is There Variability in Scoring of Student Surgical OSCE Performance Based on Examiner Experience and Expertise?
    Donohoe CL; Reilly F; Donnelly S; Cahill RA
    J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(5):1202-1210. PubMed ID: 32336628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of two standard-setting approaches in high-stakes clinical performance assessment using generalizability theory.
    Richter Lagha RA; Boscardin CK; May W; Fung CC
    Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1077-82. PubMed ID: 22722349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A student-initiated objective structured clinical examination as a sustainable cost-effective learning experience.
    Lee CB; Madrazo L; Khan U; Thangarasa T; McConnell M; Khamisa K
    Med Educ Online; 2018 Dec; 23(1):1440111. PubMed ID: 29480155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment Scores of a Mock Objective Structured Clinical Examination Administered to 99 Anesthesiology Residents at 8 Institutions.
    Tanaka P; Park YS; Liu L; Varner C; Kumar AH; Sandhu C; Yumul R; McCartney KT; Spilka J; Macario A
    Anesth Analg; 2020 Aug; 131(2):613-621. PubMed ID: 32149757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can Nonclinician Raters Be Trained to Assess Clinical Reasoning in Postencounter Patient Notes?
    Yudkowsky R; Hyderi A; Holden J; Kiser R; Stringham R; Gangopadhyaya A; Khan A; Park YS
    Acad Med; 2019 Nov; 94(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S21-S27. PubMed ID: 31663941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictive validity of a tool to resolve borderline grades in OSCEs.
    Klein Nulend R; Harris P; Shulruf B
    GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(3):Doc31. PubMed ID: 32566733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard Setting Methods for Pass/Fail Decisions on High-Stakes Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: A Validity Study.
    Yousuf N; Violato C; Zuberi RW
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 26158330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing Standard Setting Methods for Objective Structured Clinical Examinations in a Caribbean Medical School.
    Dwivedi NR; Vijayashankar NP; Hansda M; Dubey AK; Nwachukwu F; Curran V; Jillwin J
    J Med Educ Curric Dev; 2020; 7():2382120520981992. PubMed ID: 33447662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing the utility of communication OSCEs: omit station-specific checklists and provide students with narrative feedback.
    Van Nuland M; Van den Noortgate W; van der Vleuten C; Jo G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Jul; 88(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 22322068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An objective structured clinical examination for evaluating psychiatric clinical clerks.
    Hodges B; Regehr G; Hanson M; McNaughton N
    Acad Med; 1997 Aug; 72(8):715-21. PubMed ID: 9282149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the introduction of entrustment rating scales in an existing objective structured clinical examination.
    Holzhausen Y; Maaz A; März M; Sehy V; Peters H
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Aug; 19(1):319. PubMed ID: 31438938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychometric properties of a standardized-patient checklist and rating-scale form used to assess interpersonal and communication skills.
    Cohen DS; Colliver JA; Marcy MS; Fried ED; Swartz MH
    Acad Med; 1996 Jan; 71(1 Suppl):S87-9. PubMed ID: 8546794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.