These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35235354)

  • 1. Effects of changes in perceived discrimination during BLM on the 2020 presidential election.
    Mutz DC
    Sci Adv; 2022 Mar; 8(9):eabj9140. PubMed ID: 35235354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Asian American Vote in 2020: Indicators of Turnout and Vote Choice.
    Chan N; Nguy JH; Masuoka N
    Polit Behav; 2022 Dec; ():1-25. PubMed ID: 36589468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Life expectancy and voting patterns in the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
    Curtis LH; Hoffman MN; Califf RM; Hammill BG
    SSM Popul Health; 2021 Sep; 15():100840. PubMed ID: 34169139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Political Consequences of Latino Prejudice against Blacks.
    Krupnikov Y; Piston S
    Public Opin Q; 2016; 80(2):480-509. PubMed ID: 27274574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Part of the gender gap in voting for Democrats arises because a higher proportion of women than men voters are Black.
    England P; Hout M; Vilbig K; Wells K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jun; 120(25):e2221910120. PubMed ID: 37307489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The 2000 election and the future of U.S. politics.
    Teixeira R
    Int J Health Serv; 2001; 31(4):881-7. PubMed ID: 11809015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pragmatic bias impedes women's access to political leadership.
    Corbett C; Voelkel JG; Cooper M; Willer R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Feb; 119(6):. PubMed ID: 35105805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Swing voting in the 2016 presidential election in counties where midlife mortality has been rising in white non-Hispanic Americans.
    Bilal U; Knapp EA; Cooper RS
    Soc Sci Med; 2018 Jan; 197():33-38. PubMed ID: 29220706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Electoral Consequences of Affective Polarization? Negative Voting in the 2020 US Presidential Election.
    Garzia D; Ferreira da Silva F
    Am Polit Res; 2022 May; 50(3):303-311. PubMed ID: 35469326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Was the 2020 Presidential Election Nerve-Wracking?: Changes in Mental Health Among College Dreamers.
    Wang SX; Goodman J; Laurenceau JP
    Dela J Public Health; 2023 Nov; 9(4):68-76. PubMed ID: 38173957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health care in the 2004 presidential election.
    Blendon RJ; Altman DE; Benson JM; Brodie M
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1314-22. PubMed ID: 15385658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.
    Granberg D; Burlison J
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(5):231-8. PubMed ID: 6653742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Older voters and the 2004 election.
    Binstock RH
    Gerontologist; 2006 Jun; 46(3):382-4. PubMed ID: 16731877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Political voting in the United Kingdom 2019 general election and risk of living with obesity in a nationally representative sample.
    Daley AJ; Roalfe AK; Bleich SN
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38918554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Obesity Prevalence and Voting Behaviors in the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    An R; Ji M
    Am J Health Behav; 2018 Sep; 42(5):21-31. PubMed ID: 30688638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. If they were to vote, they would vote for us.
    Koudenburg N; Postmes T; Gordijn EH
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1506-10. PubMed ID: 22095975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship of public health with continued shifting of party voting in the United States.
    Wasfy JH; Healy EW; Cui J; Stewart C
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 May; 252():112921. PubMed ID: 32203851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are We Rational or Not? The Exploration of Voter Choices during the 2016 Presidential and Legislative Elections in Taiwan.
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Yen NS; Tsai CH; Cheng HP
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1762. PubMed ID: 29075215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.