These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35235354)

  • 21. Did private election administration funding advantage Democrats in 2020?
    Lal A; Thompson DM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(22):e2317563121. PubMed ID: 38771875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determinants of Attitude toward the Public Health Spending and Its Relationship with Voting Behavior in the 2012 South Korean Presidential Election.
    Eun SJ; Lee JY; Jung HM; Lee JS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163763. PubMed ID: 27711213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nigeria's 2023 presidential election and the future of healthcare in the country.
    Okonofua FE; Balogun JA
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2023 Mar; 27(3):9-18. PubMed ID: 37584966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Feb; 45(2):224-239. PubMed ID: 29985107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. State Resident Handedness, Ideology, and Political Party Preference: U.S. Presidential Election Outcomes Over the Past 60 Years.
    McCann SJH
    Psychol Rep; 2024 Jan; ():332941241227521. PubMed ID: 38214567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections.
    Mongrain P
    Polit Res Q; 2023 Dec; 76(4):1589-1603. PubMed ID: 37916035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methodology with bootstrap percentile estimates for predicting presidential election results in Ghana.
    Nortey EN; Ansah-Narh T; Asah-Asante R; Minkah R
    Springerplus; 2015; 4():525. PubMed ID: 26435890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Tsai CH; Yen NS; Chen AL; Lin WC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148643. PubMed ID: 26886266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Do political protests mobilize voters? Evidence from the Black Lives Matter protests.
    Engist O; Schafmeister F
    Public Choice; 2022; 193(3-4):293-313. PubMed ID: 36189100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. When election expectations fail: Polarized perceptions of election legitimacy increase with accumulating evidence of election outcomes and with polarized media.
    Grant MD; Flores A; Pedersen EJ; Sherman DK; Van Boven L
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0259473. PubMed ID: 34851979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Motivated reasoning: Election integrity beliefs, outcome acceptance, and polarization before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Vail KE; Harvell-Bowman L; Lockett M; Pyszczynski T; Gilmore G
    Motiv Emot; 2023; 47(2):177-192. PubMed ID: 36188156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Racial attitudes and visual cues in political judgments: support for Obama during the 2008 presidential election.
    West TV; Pearson AR; Dovidio JF; Johnson BT; Phills CE
    Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2014 Oct; 20(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 25090140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Registered nurses' perspectives on health care and the 2008 presidential election.
    Buerhaus PI; Ulrich B; Donelan K; DesRoches C
    Nurs Econ; 2008; 26(4):227-35, 257. PubMed ID: 18777971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Decisions among the undecided: implicit attitudes predict future voting behavior of undecided voters.
    Lundberg KB; Payne BK
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85680. PubMed ID: 24489666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mental Health Among Black and Latinx Sexual Minority Adults Leading Up to and Following the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election: Results from a Natural Experiment.
    Krueger EA; Westmoreland DA; Choi SK; Harper GW; Lightfoot M; Hammack PL; Meyer IH
    LGBT Health; 2021 Oct; 8(7):454-462. PubMed ID: 34410196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.
    Li P; Schloss B; Follmer DJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1668-1685. PubMed ID: 28718087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mediated Leader Effects: The Impact of Newspapers' Portrayal of Party Leadership on Electoral Support.
    Aaldering L; van der Meer T; Van der Brug W
    Int J Press Polit; 2018 Jan; 23(1):70-94. PubMed ID: 29527251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perceptions of general and postpresidential election discrimination are associated with loss of control eating among racially/ethnically diverse young men.
    Kelly NR; Smith TM; Hall GCN; Guidinger C; Williamson G; Budd EL; Giuliani NR
    Int J Eat Disord; 2018 Jan; 51(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 29149497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stressful politics: voters' cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States Presidential election.
    Stanton SJ; Labar KS; Saini EK; Kuhn CM; Beehner JC
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2010 Jun; 35(5):768-74. PubMed ID: 19962831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perception of political candidates based on their stand on abortion and taxes.
    Dorman P; Pasadeos Y
    Psychol Rep; 1992 Oct; 71(2):607-10. PubMed ID: 1410119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.