These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35235555)
1. Do individual and institutional predictors of misconduct vary by country? Results of a matched-control analysis of problematic image duplications. Fanelli D; Schleicher M; Fang FC; Casadevall A; Bik EM PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0255334. PubMed ID: 35235555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications. Fanelli D; Costas R; Fang FC; Casadevall A; Bik EM Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Jun; 25(3):771-789. PubMed ID: 29460082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity. Fanelli D; Costas R; Larivière V PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127556. PubMed ID: 26083381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study. Stretton S; Bramich NJ; Keys JR; Monk JA; Ely JA; Haley C; Woolley MJ; Woolley KL Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Oct; 28(10):1575-83. PubMed ID: 22978774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity. Bouter L Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Aug; 26(4):2363-2369. PubMed ID: 31965429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions. Stavale R; Ferreira GI; Galvão JAM; Zicker F; Novaes MRCG; Oliveira CM; Guilhem D PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214272. PubMed ID: 30986211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What Crisis? Management Researchers' Experiences with and Views of Scholarly Misconduct. Hopp C; Hoover GA Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Oct; 25(5):1549-1588. PubMed ID: 30604353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018. Dal-Ré R; Ayuso C J Med Genet; 2019 Nov; 56(11):734-740. PubMed ID: 31300549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? Nath SB; Marcus SC; Druss BG Med J Aust; 2006 Aug; 185(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 16893357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retracted publications in the drug literature. Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific misconduct and associated factors: A survey of researchers in three Chinese tertiary hospitals. Yu L; Miao M; Liu W; Zhang B; Zhang P Account Res; 2021 Feb; 28(2):95-114. PubMed ID: 32783533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. NSF Fellows' perceptions about incentives, research misconduct, and scientific integrity in STEM academia. Roy S; Edwards MA Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):5701. PubMed ID: 37029143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving biomedical journals' ethical policies: the case of research misconduct. Bosch X J Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 40(9):644-6. PubMed ID: 24505117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct as a dilemma for nursing. Hawley DJ; Jeffers JM Image J Nurs Sch; 1992; 24(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 1541472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Wager E; Kleinert S; Maturitas; 2012 Jun; 72(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 22541357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers. Palla IA; Singson M Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(8):707-724. PubMed ID: 35584318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An international study of research misconduct policies. Resnik DB; Rasmussen LM; Kissling GE Account Res; 2015; 22(5):249-66. PubMed ID: 25928177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]