These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35235555)

  • 21. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.
    Okonta P; Rossouw T
    Dev World Bioeth; 2013 Dec; 13(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 22994914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Publication misconduct among medical professionals in India.
    Dhingra D; Mishra D
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2014 Apr; 11(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 24727622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences.
    Mousavi T; Abdollahi M
    Daru; 2020 Jun; 28(1):359-369. PubMed ID: 32072484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct.
    Pupovac V; Prijić-Samaržija S; Petrovečki M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Feb; 23(1):165-181. PubMed ID: 26940319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands.
    Gopalakrishna G; Ter Riet G; Vink G; Stoop I; Wicherts JM; Bouter LM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263023. PubMed ID: 35171921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ORI findings of scientific misconduct in clinical trials and publicly funded research, 1992-2002.
    Reynolds SM
    Clin Trials; 2004; 1(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 16279291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Publication misconduct: Perceptions of participants of a faculty development programme.
    Singh SP; Dhir SK; Sharma M; Singh T
    Natl Med J India; 2018; 31(3):169-171. PubMed ID: 31044767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The different models of scientific journals].
    Chippaux JP
    Med Trop Sante Int; 2023 Dec; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 38390021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature.
    Dal-Ré R; Ayuso C
    Account Res; 2021 Jul; 28(5):280-296. PubMed ID: 33124464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.
    Marusic A; Wager E; Utrobicic A; Rothstein HR; Sambunjak D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Apr; 4(4):MR000038. PubMed ID: 27040721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comprehensive analysis of retracted journal articles in the field of veterinary medicine and animal health.
    Christopher MM
    BMC Vet Res; 2022 Feb; 18(1):73. PubMed ID: 35180878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Finding a Good Balance between Pressure to Publish and Scientific Integrity and How to Overcome Temptation of Scientific Misconduct.
    Quaia E; Vernuccio F
    Tomography; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1851-1853. PubMed ID: 35894020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Violation of research integrity principles occurs more often than we think.
    Li W; Gurrin LC; Mol BW
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Feb; 44(2):207-209. PubMed ID: 34974962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Scientific misconduct: also an issue in nursing science?
    Fierz K; Gennaro S; Dierickx K; Van Achterberg T; Morin KH; De Geest S
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Jul; 46(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 24758524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country.
    Okonta PI; Rossouw T
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 15():25. PubMed ID: 24666413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Encouraging and Rewarding the Whistleblower in Research Misconduct Cases.
    Freckelton I
    J Law Med; 2019 Jul; 26(4):719-731. PubMed ID: 31682351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scientific integrity and fraud in radiology research.
    Kwee RM; Almaghrabi MT; Kwee TC
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 156():110553. PubMed ID: 36228454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Defining and Handling Research Misconduct: A Comparison Between Chinese and European Institutional Policies.
    Li D; Cornelis G
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):302-319. PubMed ID: 32613889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Data Sharing in Biomedical Sciences: A Systematic Review of Incentives.
    Devriendt T; Shabani M; Borry P
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2021 Jun; 19(3):219-227. PubMed ID: 33926229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.
    Picardi N
    Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():1-3. PubMed ID: 28474609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.