These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35235748)

  • 1. AtomNet PoseRanker: Enriching Ligand Pose Quality for Dynamic Proteins in Virtual High-Throughput Screens.
    Stafford KA; Anderson BM; Sorenson J; van den Bedem H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Mar; 62(5):1178-1189. PubMed ID: 35235748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
    Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ensemble-based docking using biased molecular dynamics.
    Campbell AJ; Lamb ML; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2127-38. PubMed ID: 24881672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ensemble learning from ensemble docking: revisiting the optimum ensemble size problem.
    Mohammadi S; Narimani Z; Ashouri M; Firouzi R; Karimi-Jafari MH
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):410. PubMed ID: 35013496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting Protein-Ligand Docking Structure with Graph Neural Network.
    Jiang H; Wang J; Cong W; Huang Y; Ramezani M; Sarma A; Dokholyan NV; Mahdavi M; Kandemir MT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jun; 62(12):2923-2932. PubMed ID: 35699430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Higher Accuracy Achieved for Protein-Ligand Binding Pose Prediction by Elastic Network Model-Based Ensemble Docking.
    Wang A; Zhang Y; Chu H; Liao C; Zhang Z; Li G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jun; 60(6):2939-2950. PubMed ID: 32383873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3.
    Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 30084081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FRAGSITE: A Fragment-Based Approach for Virtual Ligand Screening.
    Zhou H; Cao H; Skolnick J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Apr; 61(4):2074-2089. PubMed ID: 33724022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic Docking of Macrocycles in Bound and Unbound Protein Structures with DynaDock.
    Meixner M; Zachmann M; Metzler S; Scheerer J; Zacharias M; Antes I
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jul; 62(14):3426-3441. PubMed ID: 35796228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening.
    Ferrari AM; Wei BQ; Costantino L; Shoichet BK
    J Med Chem; 2004 Oct; 47(21):5076-84. PubMed ID: 15456251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FINDSITE
    Zhou H; Cao H; Skolnick J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Nov; 58(11):2343-2354. PubMed ID: 30278128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advancing Ligand Docking through Deep Learning: Challenges and Prospects in Virtual Screening.
    Zhang X; Shen C; Zhang H; Kang Y; Hsieh CY; Hou T
    Acc Chem Res; 2024 May; 57(10):1500-1509. PubMed ID: 38577892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative.
    Totrov M; Abagyan R
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2008 Apr; 18(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 18302984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.