These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35238655)

  • 1. Extreme uncertainty and unquantifiable bias do not inform population sizes.
    Robinson OJ; Socolar JB; Stuber EF; Auer T; Berryman AJ; Boersch-Supan PH; Brightsmith DJ; Burbidge AH; Butchart SHM; Davis CL; Dokter AM; Di Giacomo AS; Farnsworth A; Fink D; Hochachka WM; Howell PE; La Sorte FA; Lees AC; Marsden S; Martin R; Martin RO; Masello JF; Miller ET; Moodley Y; Musgrove A; Noble DG; Ojeda V; Quillfeldt P; Royle JA; Ruiz-Gutierrez V; Tella JL; Yorio P; Youngflesh C; Johnston A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Mar; 119(10):e2113862119. PubMed ID: 35238655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are patterns of density dependence in the Global Population Dynamics Database driven by uncertainty about population abundance?
    Knape J; de Valpine P
    Ecol Lett; 2012 Jan; 15(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 22017744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating known sources of uncertainty to determine precautionary harvests of saltwater crocodiles.
    Bradshaw CJ; Fukuda Y; Letnic M; Brook BW
    Ecol Appl; 2006 Aug; 16(4):1436-48. PubMed ID: 16937809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrating info-gap decision theory with robust population management: a case study using the Mountain Plover.
    van der Burg MP; Tyre AJ
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Jan; 21(1):303-12. PubMed ID: 21516907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample-Size Planning for More Accurate Statistical Power: A Method Adjusting Sample Effect Sizes for Publication Bias and Uncertainty.
    Anderson SF; Kelley K; Maxwell SE
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1547-1562. PubMed ID: 28902575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accounting for sampling error when inferring population synchrony from time-series data: a Bayesian state-space modelling approach with applications.
    Santin-Janin H; Hugueny B; Aubry P; Fouchet D; Gimenez O; Pontier D
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87084. PubMed ID: 24489839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The meaning of the bias uncertainty measure.
    Bartley DL
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):519-25. PubMed ID: 18535088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deliveries at extreme prematurity: outcomes, approaches, institutional variation, and uncertainty.
    Arzuaga BH; Cummings CL
    Curr Opin Pediatr; 2019 Apr; 31(2):182-187. PubMed ID: 30608258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inbreeding coefficients for stochastically varying small population sizes-bias of calculation based on effective numbers.
    Hühn M; Piepho HP
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Feb; 226(4):467-75. PubMed ID: 14759652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias in analytical chemistry: A review of selected procedures for incorporating uncorrected bias into the expanded uncertainty of analytical measurements and a graphical method for evaluating the concordance of reference and test procedures.
    Frenkel R; Farrance I; Badrick T
    Clin Chim Acta; 2019 Aug; 495():129-138. PubMed ID: 30935874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Partial and complete dependency among data sets has minimal consequence on estimates from integrated population models.
    Weegman MD; Arnold TW; Clark RG; Schaub M
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Apr; 31(3):e2258. PubMed ID: 33176007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National population mapping from sparse survey data: A hierarchical Bayesian modeling framework to account for uncertainty.
    Leasure DR; Jochem WC; Weber EM; Seaman V; Tatem AJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(39):24173-24179. PubMed ID: 32929009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deeper Spatial Statistical Insights into Small Geographic Area Data Uncertainty.
    Griffith DA; Chun Y; Lee M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 33396823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of non-significant proportional bias in the final measurement uncertainty.
    Maroto A; Boqué R; Riu J; Rius FX
    Analyst; 2003 Apr; 128(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 12741644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of insignificant bias and its uncertainty on the coverage probability of uncertainty intervals Part 2. Evaluation for a found insignificant experimental bias.
    Synek V
    Talanta; 2007 Feb; 71(3):1304-11. PubMed ID: 19071450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the burden of occupational cancer: assessing bias and uncertainty.
    Hutchings S; Rushton L
    Occup Environ Med; 2017 Aug; 74(8):604-611. PubMed ID: 28416642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of bias in estimating measurement uncertainty.
    O'Donnell GE; Hibbert DB
    Analyst; 2005 May; 130(5):721-9. PubMed ID: 15852143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extrapolation, uncertainty factors, and the precautionary principle.
    Steel D
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2011 Sep; 42(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 21802639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Practical ANOVA Approach for Uncertainty Analysis in Population-Based Disease Microsimulation Models.
    Sharif B; Wong H; Anis AH; Kopec JA
    Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):710-717. PubMed ID: 28408016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using respondents' uncertainty scores to mitigate hypothetical bias in community-based health insurance studies.
    Donfouet HP; Mahieu PA; Malin E
    Eur J Health Econ; 2013 Apr; 14(2):277-85. PubMed ID: 22160944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.