These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35238674)

  • 21. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms.
    Koenig AM; Eagly AH; Mitchell AA; Ristikari T
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):616-42. PubMed ID: 21639606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Warriors and peacekeepers: testing a biosocial implicit leadership hypothesis of intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces.
    Spisak BR; Dekker PH; Krüger M; van Vugt M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30399. PubMed ID: 22276190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of masculinity vs. femininity on competence judgement of politician faces and election outcome prediction.
    Cheung OS; Jintcharadze D
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):16825. PubMed ID: 37803154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Harsh but Expedient: Dominant Leaders Increase Group Cooperation via Threat of Punishment.
    Chen FX; Zhang X; Laustsen L; Cheng JT
    Psychol Sci; 2021 Dec; 32(12):2005-2022. PubMed ID: 34788185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity.
    Windhager S; Schaefer K; Fink B
    Am J Hum Biol; 2011; 23(6):805-14. PubMed ID: 21957062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The (in)congruence effect of leaders' narcissism identity and reputation on performance: A socioanalytic multistakeholder perspective.
    Bernerth JB; Carter MZ; Cole MS
    J Appl Psychol; 2022 Oct; 107(10):1725-1742. PubMed ID: 34766798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Group leaders establish cooperative norms that persist in subsequent interactions.
    Harrell A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222724. PubMed ID: 31536555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preferences for Masculinity Across Faces, Bodies, and Personality Traits in Homosexual and Bisexual Chinese Men: Relationship to Sexual Self-Labels and Attitudes Toward Masculinity.
    Zheng L; Zheng Y
    Arch Sex Behav; 2016 Apr; 45(3):725-33. PubMed ID: 25975213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Do characteristics of faces that convey trustworthiness and dominance underlie perceptions of criminality?
    Flowe HD
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e37253. PubMed ID: 22675479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Servant versus directive leadership and promotability: does leader gender matter?
    Barthel ADT; Buengeler C
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():957121. PubMed ID: 38146402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated.
    Sutherland CA; Young AW; Mootz CA; Oldmeadow JA
    Br J Psychol; 2015 May; 106(2):186-208. PubMed ID: 25168952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of sex and sex-related facial traits on trust and trustworthiness: An experimental study.
    Rostovtseva VV; Butovskaya ML; Mezentseva AA; Weissing FJ
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():925601. PubMed ID: 36687832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How components of facial width to height ratio differently contribute to the perception of social traits.
    Costa M; Lio G; Gomez A; Sirigu A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172739. PubMed ID: 28235081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The gender typicality of faces and its impact on visual processing and on hiring decisions.
    von Stockhausen L; Koeser S; Sczesny S
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 23895924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Face structure predicts cooperation: men with wider faces are more generous to their in-group when out-group competition is salient.
    Stirrat M; Perrett DI
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jul; 23(7):718-22. PubMed ID: 22623509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Leaders' Future Orientation and Public Health Investment Intention: A Moderated Mediation Model of Self-Efficacy and Perceived Social Support.
    Wang J; Chou TP; Chen CP; Bu X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32971881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sexual dimorphism and personality attributions of male faces.
    Pivonkova V; Rubesova A; Lindova J; Havlicek J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1137-43. PubMed ID: 21901645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is he important to me? Source memory advantage for personally relevant cheaters.
    Kroneisen M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1129-1137. PubMed ID: 28752377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Facial expressions of authenticity: Emotion variability increases judgments of trustworthiness and leadership.
    Slepian ML; Carr EW
    Cognition; 2019 Feb; 183():82-98. PubMed ID: 30445313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A memory advantage for untrustworthy faces.
    Rule NO; Slepian ML; Ambady N
    Cognition; 2012 Nov; 125(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 22874071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.