These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35239288)

  • 1. Instrumented Versus Noninstrumented Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review.
    Hirase T; Ling JF; Haghshenas V; Weiner BK
    Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Jun; 35(5):213-221. PubMed ID: 35239288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term functional outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation as a support for posterolateral spinal fusion: randomized clinical study with a 5-year follow-up.
    Bjarke Christensen F; Stender Hansen E; Laursen M; Thomsen K; Bünger CE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jun; 27(12):1269-77. PubMed ID: 12065973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noninstrumented Lumbar Fusion with Bone Morphogenetic Proteins for Spinal Stenosis with Spondylolisthesis in the Elderly.
    Bindal S; Bindal SK; Bindal M; Bindal AK
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e1427-e1435. PubMed ID: 30904805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.
    Macki M; Bydon M; Weingart R; Sciubba D; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Witham T
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 138():117-23. PubMed ID: 26318363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation.
    Fischgrund JS; Mackay M; Herkowitz HN; Brower R; Montgomery DM; Kurz LT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Dec; 22(24):2807-12. PubMed ID: 9431616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective, randomized clinical study.
    Thomsen K; Christensen FB; Eiskjaer SP; Hansen ES; Fruensgaard S; Bünger CE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Dec; 22(24):2813-22. PubMed ID: 9431617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can preoperative radiographic parameters be used to predict fusion in non-instrumented posterolateral fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis?
    Agabegi SS; Majid K; Fischgrund JS; Vaccaro AR; Patel T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):E1709-14. PubMed ID: 21508884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review.
    Martin CR; Gruszczynski AT; Braunsfurth HA; Fallatah SM; O'Neil J; Wai EK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(16):1791-8. PubMed ID: 17632401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes.
    Katz JN; Lipson SJ; Lew RA; Grobler LJ; Weinstein JN; Brick GW; Fossel AH; Liang MH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 May; 22(10):1123-31. PubMed ID: 9160471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Levin JM; Tanenbaum JE; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Overley SC
    Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):1088-1098. PubMed ID: 29452283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
    Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review: Reduced reoperation rate for multilevel lumbar laminectomies with noninstrumented versus instrumented fusions.
    Epstein NE
    Surg Neurol Int; 2016; 7(Suppl 13):S337-46. PubMed ID: 27274408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-Level Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Posterior Approach: Is Transforaminal Lateral Interbody Fusion Mandatory?: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 2-Year Follow-Up.
    Challier V; Boissiere L; Obeid I; Vital JM; Castelain JE; Bénard A; Ong N; Ghailane S; Pointillart V; Mazas S; Mariey R; Gille O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Apr; 42(8):531-539. PubMed ID: 27548582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion on lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dantas F; Dantas FLR; Botelho RV
    Spine J; 2022 May; 22(5):756-768. PubMed ID: 34896611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A systematic review of clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Noorian S; Sorensen K; Cho W
    Spine J; 2018 Aug; 18(8):1441-1454. PubMed ID: 29746966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Bydon M; Macki M; Abt NB; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Sciubba DM
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 25463402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of functional outcomes following surgical decompression and posterolateral instrumented fusion in single level low grade lumbar degenerative versus isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Omidi-Kashani F; Hasankhani EG; Rahimi MD; Khanzadeh R
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2014 Jun; 6(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 24900900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus instrumented posterolateral fusion In degenerative spondylolisthesis: An attempt to evaluate the superiority of one method over the other.
    Ghasemi AA
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Nov; 150():1-5. PubMed ID: 27565009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Droeghaag R; Hermans SMM; Caelers IJMH; Evers SMAA; van Hemert WLW; van Santbrink H
    Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):945-954. PubMed ID: 33493680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.