130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35240831)
1. Contribution of ultrasound examination in the detection of unexpected uterine and adnexal findings in reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
Smažinka Martin; Havíř Martin; Rušavý Zdeněk; Vlasák Pavel; Kovářová Veronika; Veverková Adéla; Ismail Khaled Mostafa; Kališ Vladimír
Ceska Gynekol; 2022; 87(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 35240831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.
Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomic outcomes after pelvic-organ-prolapse surgery: comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy.
Marschalek J; Trofaier ML; Yerlikaya G; Hanzal E; Koelbl H; Ott J; Umek W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():33-6. PubMed ID: 25461349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significance of preoperative calculation of uterine weight as an indicator for preserving the uterus in pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Sheng Q; Ma N; Huang H; Xu B; He C; Song Y
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2015; 8(1):900-5. PubMed ID: 25755793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional outcome after pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with or without concomitant hysterectomy.
Farthmann J; Watermann D; Erbes T; Roth K; Nanovska P; Gitsch G; Gabriel B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Mar; 291(3):573-7. PubMed ID: 25200688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abnormal Pathology Following Vaginal Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair.
Geron Y; From A; Peled Y; Zeevi G; Matot R; Nachshon S; Krissi H
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38700374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional pelvic floor anatomy in Nepali women attending a general gynaecology clinic.
Turel F; Caagbay D; Dietz HP
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Oct; 29(10):1435-1440. PubMed ID: 29270722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of preoperative pelvic floor muscle training on pelvic floor muscle contraction and symptomatic and anatomical pelvic organ prolapse after surgery: randomized controlled trial.
Nyhus MØ; Mathew S; Salvesen Ø; Salvesen KÅ; Stafne S; Volløyhaug I
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 56(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 32144829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Risk Factors for Uterine Cervical Elongation among Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Liu YY; Wang CL; Loo ZX; Lin KL; Long CY
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(17):. PubMed ID: 34501846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protocol for a prospective multisite cohort study investigating hysterectomy versus uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery: the HUPPS study.
Scime NV; Ramage K; Brennand EA;
BMJ Open; 2021 Oct; 11(10):e053679. PubMed ID: 34607873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is abnormal uterine descent on translabial ultrasound?
Shek KL; Dietz HP
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1783-7. PubMed ID: 26174659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association between ICS POP-Q coordinates and translabial ultrasound findings: implications for definition of 'normal pelvic organ support'.
Dietz HP; Kamisan Atan I; Salita A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 47(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 25854801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pelvic organ prolapse in Caucasian and East Asian women: a comparative study.
Cheung RYK; Chan SSC; Shek KL; Chung TKH; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):541-545. PubMed ID: 30246270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uterus preserving vaginal surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy for correction of female pelvic organ prolapse.
Iliev VN; Andonova IT
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 24802202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction.
Fink K; Shachar IB; Braun NM
Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 27564289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transvaginal management of severe pelvic organ prolapse in nulliparous women.
Lo TS; Jaili S; Uy-Patrimonio MC; Karim NB; Ibrahim R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Mar; 43(3):543-550. PubMed ID: 28160508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cut-offs for defining uterine prolapse using transperineal ultrasound in Chinese women: prospective multicenter study.
Wu M; Wang X; Lin X; Fu Y; Chen H; Guan X; Huang W; Chen Y; Zhang L; Jing C; Wei J; Tian J; Zhang X
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 58(1):127-132. PubMed ID: 33094536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of short-term outcomes following pelvic reconstruction with Perigee and Apogee systems: hysterectomy or not?
Chu LC; Chuang FC; Kung FT; Huang KH
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jan; 23(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 21822713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
