These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35244035)

  • 1. The perception of smile attractiveness to altered vertical position of maxillary anteriors by various groups.
    Babeer WA; Bakhsh ZT; Natto ZS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Mar; 101(9):e28660. PubMed ID: 35244035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of the vertical position of maxillary central incisors on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
    Machado AW; McComb RW; Moon W; Gandini LG
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Dec; 25(6):392-401. PubMed ID: 24180675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of symmetric and asymmetric alterations of maxillary canine gingival margin on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists, dentists, and laypersons.
    Katiyar S; Gandhi S; Sodawala J; Anita G; Hamdani S; Jain S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):586-591. PubMed ID: 28169254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of maxillary lateral incisor width ratio on perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
    Martinez Florez D; Rinchuse D; Zullo T
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Apr; 33(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 33155745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do different vertical positions of maxillary central incisors influence smile esthetics perception?
    Menezes EBC; Bittencourt MAV; Machado AW
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(2):95-105. PubMed ID: 28658361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the perception of smile esthetics by laypersons, dental students and dental practitioners.
    Cracel-Nogueira F; Pinho T
    Int Orthod; 2013 Dec; 11(4):432-44. PubMed ID: 24427802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does the vertical position of maxillary central incisors in men influence smile esthetics perception?
    Simões D; Meyge de Brito G; Teixeira Cangussu MC; Machado AW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):485-492. PubMed ID: 31582120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics.
    Pinho S; Ciriaco C; Faber J; Lenza MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 18068592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Aesthetic perception of the vertical position of the incisal edges of the maxillary lateral incisors in the smile arch].
    Stolz S; Lefebvre F; Bolender Y; Kanter D
    Orthod Fr; 2017 Sep; 88(3):251-261. PubMed ID: 29043973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of canine characteristics and symmetry on perceived smile attractiveness when canine teeth are substituted for lateral incisors.
    Rayner WJ; Barber SK; Spencer RJ
    J Orthod; 2015 Mar; 42(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 25808380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does different vertical position of maxillary central incisors in women with different facial vertical height affect smile esthetics perception?
    Atik E; Turkoglu H
    Prog Orthod; 2023 Aug; 24(1):28. PubMed ID: 37544965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Smile attractiveness of patients treated for congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors as rated by dentists, laypersons, and the patients themselves.
    De-Marchi LM; Pini NI; Ramos AL; Pascotto RC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):540-6. PubMed ID: 24725615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of torque and vertical position of maxillary canine on smile esthetics.
    Haerian A; Rafiei E; Tehrani PF; Toodehzaeim MH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jul; 164(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 36842948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered dental esthetics in cases with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors.
    Rosa M; Olimpo A; Fastuca R; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():34. PubMed ID: 24325825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of facial type on attractiveness of vertical canine position from the perspective of orthodontists and laypeople.
    Acar YB; Abuhan E; Boyacıyan R; Özdemir F
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Mar; 92(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 34652426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of lightness difference of single anterior tooth to smile attractiveness.
    Ntovas P; Diamantopoulou S; Gogolas N; Sarri V; Papandreou A; Sakellaridi E; Petrakos G; Papazoglou E
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Sep; 33(6):856-864. PubMed ID: 33264491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of maxillary canine gingival margin asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
    Correa BD; Vieira Bittencourt MA; Machado AW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 24373655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of variations in maxillary lateral incisor dimensions on smile esthetics.
    Haerian A; Rafiei E; Joshan N; Eghbali R; Tehrani PF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jan; 161(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 34417035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of gingival display on smile attractiveness assessed by Saudi Arabian laypersons and dental professionals.
    Alaqeely R; AlRowis R; AlSeddiq A; AlShehri F; Aldosari M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18718. PubMed ID: 37907618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the presence of unilateral maxillary incisor edge asymmetries influence the perception of smile esthetics?
    Betrine Ribeiro J; Alecrim Figueiredo B; Wilson Machado A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Jul; 29(4):291-297. PubMed ID: 28556552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.