These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35244042)
21. Comparison of results from novice and trained personnel using the Macintosh laryngoscope, Pentax AWS®, C-MAC™ and Bonfils intubation fibrescope: a manikin study. Lye ST; Liaw CM; Seet E; Koh KF Singapore Med J; 2013 Feb; 54(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 23462828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study. Enomoto Y; Asai T; Arai T; Kamishima K; Okuda Y Br J Anaesth; 2008 Apr; 100(4):544-8. PubMed ID: 18238836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for intubation performed by novice physicians in a difficult airway scenario. Szarpak L; Smereka J; Ladny JR Am J Emerg Med; 2017 May; 35(5):796-797. PubMed ID: 28139309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Efficacy of Pentax airway scope versus Macintosh laryngoscope when used by novice personnel: A prospective randomized controlled study. Kim KN; Jeong MA; Oh YN; Kim SY; Kim JY J Int Med Res; 2018 Jan; 46(1):258-271. PubMed ID: 28835153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations. Zhu H; Liu J; Suo L; Zhou C; Sun Y; Jiang H BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31470814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of the Glidescope, Pentax AWS, and Macintosh laryngoscopes when used by novice personnel: a manikin study. Malik MA; Hassett P; Carney J; Higgins BD; Harte BH; Laffey JG Can J Anaesth; 2009 Nov; 56(11):802-11. PubMed ID: 19655213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Miller and Airtraq laryngoscopes for orotracheal intubation by physicians wearing CBRN protective equipment during infant resuscitation: a randomized crossover simulation study. Claret PG; Asencio R; Rogier D; Roger C; Fournier P; Tran TA; Sebbane M; Bobbia X; Emmanuel de La Coussaye J Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 24():35. PubMed ID: 27004945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of a New Video Intubation Stylet and McGrath® MAC Video Laryngoscope for Intubation in an Airway Manikin with Normal Airway and Cervical Spine Immobilization Scenarios by Novice Personnel: A Randomized Crossover Study. Park JW; An S; Park S; Nahm FS; Han SH; Kim JH Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():4288367. PubMed ID: 34805400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimizing intubation technique using a single-use video laryngoscope: A comparative study in a simulation model. Chen HC; Liu JF; Chi MC; Cheng HL Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jul; 103(28):e38946. PubMed ID: 38996120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Pentax-AWS Airwayscope video laryngoscope, Airtraq optic laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope during cardiopulmonary resuscitation under cervical stabilization: a manikin study. Komasawa N; Ueki R; Kohama H; Nishi S; Kaminoh Y J Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 21901329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the Glidescope, the Pentax AWS, and the Truview EVO2 with the Macintosh laryngoscope in experienced anaesthetists: a manikin study. Malik MA; O'Donoghue C; Carney J; Maharaj CH; Harte BH; Laffey JG Br J Anaesth; 2009 Jan; 102(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 19059923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A randomised crossover trial comparing the Airtraq(®) NT, McGrath(®) MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation of simulated easy and difficult airways in a manikin. Gómez-Ríos MÁ; Pinegger S; de Carrillo Mantilla M; Vizcaino L; Barreto-Calvo P; Paech MJ; Gómez-Ríos D; López-Calviño B Braz J Anesthesiol; 2016; 66(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 27108827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of Direct and Video Laryngoscopes during Different Airway Scenarios Performed by Experienced Paramedics: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Study. Ruetzler K; Szarpak L; Smereka J; Dabrowski M; Bialka S; Mosteller L; Szarpak A; Ludwin K; Wojewodzka-Zelezniakowicz M; Ladny JR Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():5382739. PubMed ID: 32149114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study. Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of 3 video laryngoscopes with the Macintosh in a manikin with easy and difficult simulated airways. Wang PK; Huang CC; Lee Y; Chen TY; Lai HY Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):330-8. PubMed ID: 23158595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of the storz video Macintosh laryngoscope for use in difficult airways: A human simulator study. Bair AE; Olmsted K; Brown CA; Barker T; Pallin D; Walls RM Acad Emerg Med; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1134-7. PubMed ID: 21064263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of VividTrac, King Vision and Macintosh laryngoscopes in normal and difficult airways during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation among novices. Keresztes D; Mérei Á; Rozanovic M; Nagy E; Kovács-Ábrahám Z; Oláh J; Maróti P; Rendeki S; Nagy B; Woth G PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0260140. PubMed ID: 34793558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intubation using VieScope vs. Video laryngoscopy in full personal protective equipment - a randomized, controlled simulation trial. Ecker H; Kolvenbach S; Herff H; Wetsch WA BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):288. PubMed ID: 34809581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A randomized comparison of the use of an optical compared with a rigid laryngoscope on the success rate of novices performing tracheal intubation. de Oliveira GS; Fitzgerald PC; Beckerly R; McCarthy RJ Anesth Analg; 2011 Mar; 112(3):615-8. PubMed ID: 21233492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A randomised comparison of InnoScope and Macintosh laryngoscope in simulated difficult tracheal intubation in manikins. Fong AW; Lam KC; Cheng BC; Lam KK; Chan MT Anaesthesia; 2013 Feb; 68(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 23153175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]