These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35244161)

  • 21. Bias in estimates of variance components in populations undergoing genomic selection: a simulation study.
    Gao H; Madsen P; Aamand GP; Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC; Jensen J
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):956. PubMed ID: 31818251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. EM algorithm for Bayesian estimation of genomic breeding values.
    Hayashi T; Iwata H
    BMC Genet; 2010 Jan; 11():3. PubMed ID: 20092655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genome-enabled prediction using the BLR (Bayesian Linear Regression) R-package.
    de Los Campos G; Pérez P; Vazquez AI; Crossa J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():299-320. PubMed ID: 23756896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Factors affecting GEBV accuracy with single-step Bayesian models.
    Zhou L; Mrode R; Zhang S; Zhang Q; Li B; Liu JF
    Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Jan; 120(2):100-109. PubMed ID: 29167557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle.
    Verbyla KL; Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Goddard ME
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Oct; 91(5):307-11. PubMed ID: 19922694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An efficient exact method to obtain GBLUP and single-step GBLUP when the genomic relationship matrix is singular.
    Fernando RL; Cheng H; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):80. PubMed ID: 27788669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Major advances in genetic evaluation techniques.
    Powell RL; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Apr; 89(4):1337-48. PubMed ID: 16537965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation.
    Clark SA; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 May; 43(1):18. PubMed ID: 21575265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. XSIM: A structural similarity index measure optimized for MRI QSM.
    Milovic C; Tejos C; Silva J; Shmueli K; Irarrazaval P
    Magn Reson Med; 2025 Jan; 93(1):411-421. PubMed ID: 39176438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genomic prediction for growth and reproduction traits in pig using an admixed reference population.
    Song H; Zhang J; Jiang Y; Gao H; Tang S; Mi S; Yu F; Meng Q; Xiao W; Zhang Q; Ding X
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3415-3424. PubMed ID: 28805914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits.
    Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Feb; 94(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 22353246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures.
    Bastiaansen JW; Coster A; Calus MP; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jan; 44(1):3. PubMed ID: 22273519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.
    Wang T; Chen YP; Goddard ME; Meuwissen TH; Kemper KE; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):34. PubMed ID: 25926276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A simulation study of a honeybee breeding scheme accounting for polyandry, direct and maternal effects on colony performance.
    Kistler T; Basso B; Phocas F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Sep; 53(1):71. PubMed ID: 34496761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain.
    Liu H; Henryon M; Sørensen AC
    Animal; 2017 Apr; 11(4):547-555. PubMed ID: 27531662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Review: Opportunities and challenges for small populations of dairy cattle in the era of genomics.
    Schöpke K; Swalve HH
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1050-60. PubMed ID: 26957010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A fast and efficient approach for genomic selection with high-density markers.
    Pungpapong V; Muir WM; Li X; Zhang D; Zhang M
    G3 (Bethesda); 2012 Oct; 2(10):1179-84. PubMed ID: 23050228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A Bayesian Genomic Multi-output Regressor Stacking Model for Predicting Multi-trait Multi-environment Plant Breeding Data.
    Montesinos-López OA; Montesinos-López A; Crossa J; Cuevas J; Montesinos-López JC; Gutiérrez ZS; Lillemo M; Philomin J; Singh R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Oct; 9(10):3381-3393. PubMed ID: 31427455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Method for the estimation of genetic merit of animals with uncertain paternity under Bayesian inference.
    Shiotsuki L; Cardoso FF; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Apr; 135(2):116-123. PubMed ID: 29575105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison between estimation of breeding values and fixed effects using Bayesian and empirical BLUP estimation under selection on parents and missing pedigree information.
    Schenkel FS; Schaeffer LR; Boettcher PJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(1):41-59. PubMed ID: 11929624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.