These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3524452)

  • 1. Comparison of membrane filter, multiple-fermentation-tube, and presence-absence techniques for detecting total coliforms in small community water systems.
    Jacobs NJ; Zeigler WL; Reed FC; Stukel TA; Rice EW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1986 May; 51(5):1007-12. PubMed ID: 3524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The presence-absence coliform test for monitoring drinking water quality.
    Rice EW; Geldreich EE; Read EJ
    Public Health Rep; 1989; 104(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 2493663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water: current methods and emerging approaches.
    Rompré A; Servais P; Baudart J; de-Roubin MR; Laurent P
    J Microbiol Methods; 2002 Mar; 49(1):31-54. PubMed ID: 11777581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coliform species recovered from untreated surface water and drinking water by the membrane filter, standard, and modified most-probable-number techniques.
    Evans TM; LeChevallier MW; Waarvick CE; Seidler RJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Mar; 41(3):657-63. PubMed ID: 7013706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: comparison with the standard multiple tube fermentation method.
    Edberg SC; Allen MJ; Smith DB
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1988 Jun; 54(6):1595-601. PubMed ID: 3046490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of noncoliforms on coliform detection in potable groundwater: improved recovery with an anaerobic membrane filter technique.
    Franzblau SG; Hinnebusch BJ; Kelley LM; Sinclair NA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 48(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 6383216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Failure of the most-probable-number technique to detect coliforms in drinking water and raw water supplies.
    Evans TM; Waarvick CE; Seidler RJ; LeChevallier MW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 41(1):130-8. PubMed ID: 7013694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Clark's presence-absence test and the membrane filter method for coliform detection in potable water samples.
    Pipes WO; Minnigh HA; Moyer B; Troy MA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1986 Sep; 52(3):439-43. PubMed ID: 3532953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of verification procedures for the membrane filter total coliform technique.
    LeChevallier MW; Cameron SC; McFeters GA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1983 Mar; 45(3):1126-8. PubMed ID: 6342533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the presence-absence and membrane filter techniques for coliform detection in small, nonchlorinated water distribution systems.
    Bancroft K; Nelson ET; Childers GW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1989 Feb; 55(2):507-10. PubMed ID: 2655537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Injured coliforms in drinking water.
    McFeters GA; Kippin JS; LeChevallier MW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 51(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 3513698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pollution indicator bacteria associated with municipal raw and drinking water supplies.
    Clark JA; Pagel JE
    Can J Microbiol; 1977 Apr; 23(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 324588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Autoanalysis Colilert test for detection and enumeration of total coliforms.
    Covert TC; Shadix LC; Rice EW; Haines JR; Freyberg RW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 55(10):2443-7. PubMed ID: 2513773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Total coliform detection in drinking water: comparison of membrane filtration with Colilert and Coliquik.
    Olson BH; Clark DL; Milner BB; Stewart MH; Wolfe RL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1991 May; 57(5):1535-9. PubMed ID: 1854206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the hydrophobic-grid membrane filter procedure and standard methods for coliform analysis of water.
    McDaniels AE; Bordner RH; Menkedick JR; Weber CI
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1987 May; 53(5):1003-9. PubMed ID: 3606086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of membrane filtration and multiple-tube fermentation by the colilert and enterolert methods for detection of waterborne coliform bacteria, Escherichia coli, and enterococci used in drinking and bathing water quality monitoring in southern sweden.
    Eckner KF
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1998 Aug; 64(8):3079-83. PubMed ID: 9687478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of verification media and resuscitation on accuracy of the membrane filter total coliform enumeration technique.
    Evans TM; Seidler RJ; LeChevallier MW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1981 May; 41(5):1144-51. PubMed ID: 7020591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enumeration of Escherichia coli and coliforms in surface water by multiple tube fermentation and membrane filter methods.
    Grasso GM; Sammarco ML; Ripabelli G; Fanelli I
    Microbios; 2000; 103(405):119-25. PubMed ID: 11092193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative studies of fresh and seawater for the determination of total coliform and fecal coliform bacteria according to the European Economic Community guideline 76/160 (bathing water) by the use of the most-probable-number method with BRILA-MUG broth and differentiation according to the drinking water ordinance].
    Havemeister G; Aleksic S; Bockemühl J; Heinemeyer EA; Müller HE; Von Pritzbuer E
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1991 May; 191(5-6):523-38. PubMed ID: 1883475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization as a Rapid, Accurate Method for Detecting Coliforms in Water Samples.
    Kuo JT; Chang LL; Yen CY; Tsai TH; Chang YC; Huang YT; Chung YC
    Biosensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 33374317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.