124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35245391)
21. Computer navigation-aided joint-preserving resection and custom-made endoprosthesis reconstruction for bone sarcomas: long-term outcomes.
Xu LH; Zhang Q; Zhao HT; Yu F; Niu XH
Chin Med J (Engl); 2021 Oct; 134(21):2597-2602. PubMed ID: 34748525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Do manual cutting guides for total knee arthroplasty introduce systematic error?
Hohmann E; Tetsworth K
Int Orthop; 2016 Feb; 40(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 26298536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can Navigation Improve the Ability to Achieve Tumor-free Margins in Pelvic and Sacral Primary Bone Sarcoma Resections? A Historically Controlled Study.
Bosma SE; Cleven AHG; Dijkstra PDS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jul; 477(7):1548-1559. PubMed ID: 31107331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of registration accuracy during computer-aided oncologic limb-salvage surgery.
Stoll KE; Miles JD; White JK; Punt SE; Conrad EU; Ching RP
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Sep; 10(9):1469-75. PubMed ID: 25578991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. How precise is computer-navigated gap assessment in TKA?
Stiehl JB; Heck DA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 25034979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fluoroscopically calibrated 3D-printed patient-specific instruments improve the accuracy of osteotomy during bone tumor resection adjacent to joints.
Wang C; Huang S; Yu Y; Liang H; Wang R; Tang X; Ji T
3D Print Med; 2024 Apr; 10(1):15. PubMed ID: 38656431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Intraoperative O-arm-navigated resection in musculoskeletal tumors.
Fujiwara T; Kunisada T; Takeda K; Hasei J; Nakata E; Nakahara R; Yoshida A; Ozaki T
J Orthop Sci; 2018 Nov; 23(6):1045-1050. PubMed ID: 30037470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Deformable 3D-2D image registration and analysis of global spinal alignment in long-length intraoperative spine imaging.
Zhang X; Uneri A; Huang Y; Jones CK; Witham TF; Helm PA; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 49(9):5715-5727. PubMed ID: 35762028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improving registration accuracy during total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study of a new, 3-D mini-optical navigation system.
Cross MB; Schwarzkopf R; Miller TT; Bogner EA; Muir JM; Vigdorchik JM
Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 28885648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The accuracy of image-free computer navigation in the placement of the femoral component of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: a cadaver study.
Davis ET; Gallie P; Macgroarty K; Waddell JP; Schemitsch E
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Apr; 89(4):557-60. PubMed ID: 17463131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Precise resection and biological reconstruction under navigation guidance for young patients with juxta-articular bone sarcoma in lower extremity: preliminary report.
Li J; Wang Z; Guo Z; Chen GJ; Yang M; Pei GX
J Pediatr Orthop; 2014 Jan; 34(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 23812146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computer navigation-assisted surgery for musculoskeletal tumors: a closer look into the learning curve.
Staats K; Panotopoulos J; Tiefenboeck TM; Windhager R; Funovics PT
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2017 Aug; 27(6):851-858. PubMed ID: 28647781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Imageless versus image-based registration in navigated arthroscopy of the hip: a cadaver-based assessment.
Audenaert E; Smet B; Pattyn C; Khanduja V
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 May; 94(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 22529081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. What Is the Expected Learning Curve in Computer-assisted Navigation for Bone Tumor Resection?
Farfalli GL; Albergo JI; Ritacco LE; Ayerza MA; Milano FE; Aponte-Tinao LA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):668-675. PubMed ID: 26913513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Joint-preserving tumor resection and reconstruction using image-guided computer navigation.
Wong KC; Kumta SM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Mar; 471(3):762-73. PubMed ID: 22948524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of a New Robotically Assisted Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Study.
Parratte S; Price AJ; Jeys LM; Jackson WF; Clarke HD
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2799-2803. PubMed ID: 31301912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validation of the femoral component placement during hip resurfacing: a comparison between the conventional jig, patient-specific template, and CT-based navigation.
Kitada M; Sakai T; Murase T; Hanada T; Nakamura N; Sugano N
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 23460526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Resection margins obtained with patient-specific instruments for resecting primary pelvic bone sarcomas: A case-control study.
Evrard R; Schubert T; Paul L; Docquier PL
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Jun; 105(4):781-787. PubMed ID: 30982774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computer-assisted navigation and musculoskeletal sarcoma surgery.
Cheong D; Letson GD
Cancer Control; 2011 Jul; 18(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21666579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is computer navigation when used in the surgery of iliosacral pelvic bone tumours safer for the patient?
Laitinen MK; Parry MC; Albergo JI; Grimer RJ; Jeys LM
Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):261-266. PubMed ID: 28148671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
