117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35245822)
1. Reliability of negative cone specimens of the cervix: A review.
Lorenset LC; Zanine RM
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Jun; 58():151929. PubMed ID: 35245822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization.
Giannella L; Mfuta K; Gardini G; Rubino T; Fodero C; Prandi S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():68-74. PubMed ID: 25656975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The expression of p16 (INK4a) and Ki-67 in relation to high-risk human papilloma viral load and residual disease after conization with positive margins.
Song SH; Park HM; Eom DW; Lee JK; Lee NW; Kim AR; Hur JY; Lee KW; Park YK; Saw HS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(4):858-67. PubMed ID: 17367326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nomogram-based prediction of cervical dysplasia persistence/recurrence.
Bogani G; Tagliabue E; Ferla S; Martinelli F; Ditto A; Chiappa V; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Taverna F; Lombardo C; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2019 Sep; 28(5):435-440. PubMed ID: 30489353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Negative predictive value of human papillomavirus test following conization of the cervix uteri.
Jain S; Tseng CJ; Horng SG; Soong YK; Pao CC
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jul; 82(1):177-80. PubMed ID: 11426982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.
Miroshnichenko GG; Parva M; Holtz DO; Klemens JA; Dunton CJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 19098600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MiRNA detection in cervical exfoliated cells for missed high-grade lesions in women with LSIL/CIN1 diagnosis after colposcopy-guided biopsy.
Ye J; Cheng XD; Cheng B; Cheng YF; Chen XJ; Lu WG
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):112. PubMed ID: 30700264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Negative HPV testing among patients with biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3 or cervical cancer.
González-Bosquet E; Fernandez S; Sabra S; Lailla JM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Feb; 136(2):229-231. PubMed ID: 28099735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship of human papillomavirus infection with endocervical glandular involvement on cone specimens in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Spinillo A; Dominoni M; Boschi AC; Cesari S; Fiandrino G; Gardella B
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):630-635. PubMed ID: 33041069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of clinical evolution in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) treated by cervical conization.
Cardoso FA; Campaner AB; Silva MA
APMIS; 2014 Mar; 122(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 23763281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Negative cone biopsies. A reappraisal.
Diakomanolis E; Haidopoulos D; Chatzipapas I; Rodolakis A; Stefanidis K; Markaki S
J Reprod Med; 2003 Aug; 48(8):617-21. PubMed ID: 12971142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dual immunostaining of cervical cytology specimens with atypical squamous cells for p16/Ki-67 does not exclude the existence of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Koo YJ; Hahn HS; Lee IH; Lim KT; Lee KH; Kim HS; Kim TJ; Chun YK; Kim HS; Hong SR
Virchows Arch; 2013 Nov; 463(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 24081504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reevaluation of negative cervical conizations: Frequency, diagnostic errors, risk factors and management.
Lorenset LC; Percicote AP; Munhos SHO; Zanine RM
Pathol Res Pract; 2024 Apr; 257():155283. PubMed ID: 38614053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Radiosurgical treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Reinthaller A; Kainz C; Tempfer G; Joura E
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1994; 34(2):98-101. PubMed ID: 7950445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
