175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35245881)
1. Reliability and agreement of lumbar multifidus volume and fat fraction quantification using magnetic resonance imaging.
Rummens S; Bosch S; Dierckx S; Vanmechelen A; Peeters R; Brumagne S; Desloovere K; Peers K
Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2022 Jun; 59():102532. PubMed ID: 35245881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional freehand ultrasonography to measure muscle volume of the lumbar multifidus: Reliability of processing technique and validity through comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.
Rummens S; Dierckx S; Brumagne S; Desloovere K; Peers K
J Anat; 2024 Apr; 244(4):601-609. PubMed ID: 38087647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of quantifying the spatial distribution of fatty infiltration in lumbar paravertebral muscles using a new segmentation method for T1-weighted MRI.
Mhuiris ÁN; Volken T; Elliott JM; Hoggarth M; Samartzis D; Crawford RJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 May; 17():234. PubMed ID: 27230072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of paraspinal muscle composition measurements using IDEAL fat-water and T2-weighted MR images.
Masi S; Rye M; Roussac A; Naghdi N; Rosenstein B; Bailey JF; Fortin M
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Mar; 23(1):48. PubMed ID: 36997912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing lumbar paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area and fat composition with T1 versus T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Reliability and concurrent validity.
Cooley JR; Hebert JJ; de Zoete A; Jensen TS; Algra PR; Kjaer P; Walker BF
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0244633. PubMed ID: 33544707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methodological considerations in region of interest definitions for paraspinal muscles in axial MRIs of the lumbar spine.
Berry DB; Padwal J; Johnson S; Parra CL; Ward SR; Shahidi B
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 May; 19(1):135. PubMed ID: 29734942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasound Imaging Analysis of the Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Echo Intensity: Intra-Rater and Inter-Rater Reliability of a Novice and an Experienced Rater.
Fortin M; Rosenstein B; Levesque J; Nandlall N
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 May; 57(5):. PubMed ID: 34065340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of ultrasound imaging for the assessment of lumbar multifidi thickness in older adults with chronic low back pain.
Sions JM; Velasco TO; Teyhen DS; Hicks GE
J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2015; 38(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 24743751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lumbar muscle structure and function in chronic versus recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional study.
Goubert D; De Pauw R; Meeus M; Willems T; Cagnie B; Schouppe S; Van Oosterwijck J; Dhondt E; Danneels L
Spine J; 2017 Sep; 17(9):1285-1296. PubMed ID: 28456669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can diffusion tensor imaging and tractography represent cross-sectional area of lumbar multifidus in patients with LUMBAR spine disease?
Oh J; Jung JY; Ko YJ
Muscle Nerve; 2018 Feb; 57(2):200-205. PubMed ID: 28271516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of ultrasound measurement of the lateral abdominal and lumbar multifidus muscles in individuals with chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional test-retest study.
Abbasi S; Hadian Rasanani MR; Olyaei GR; Ghotbi N; Rasouli O
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2021 Apr; 26():394-400. PubMed ID: 33992273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of lumbar multifidus ultrasound assessment during the active straight leg raise test.
Plaza-Manzano G; Navarro-Santana MJ; Valera-Calero JA; Fabero-Garrido R; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C; López-de-Uralde-Villanueva I
Eur J Clin Invest; 2022 May; 52(5):e13728. PubMed ID: 34882303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Real-time ultrasound measures of lumbar erector spinae and multifidus: reliability and comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.
Belavý DL; Armbrecht G; Felsenberg D
Physiol Meas; 2015 Nov; 36(11):2285-99. PubMed ID: 26450474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evaluation of lumbar multifidus muscle function via palpation: reliability and validity of a new clinical test.
Hebert JJ; Koppenhaver SL; Teyhen DS; Walker BF; Fritz JM
Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1196-202. PubMed ID: 24314767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of an automated thresholding algorithm for the quantification of paraspinal muscle composition from MRI images.
Fortin M; Omidyeganeh M; Battié MC; Ahmad O; Rivaz H
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 May; 16(1):61. PubMed ID: 28532491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative paraspinal muscle measurements: inter-software reliability and agreement using OsiriX and ImageJ.
Fortin M; Battié MC
Phys Ther; 2012 Jun; 92(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 22403091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of panoramic ultrasound imaging and agreement with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of lumbar multifidus anatomical cross-sectional area.
Fitze DP; Franchi MV; Peterhans L; Frey WO; Spörri J
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):19647. PubMed ID: 37949957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Convolutional neural networks for the automatic segmentation of lumbar paraspinal muscles in people with low back pain.
Wesselink EO; Elliott JM; Coppieters MW; Hancock MJ; Cronin B; Pool-Goudzwaard A; Weber Ii KA
Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):13485. PubMed ID: 35931772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Criterion Validity of Ultrasound Imaging: Assessment of Multifidi Cross-Sectional Area in Older Adults With and Without Chronic Low Back Pain.
Sions JM; Teyhen DS; Hicks GE
J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2017; 40(2):74-79. PubMed ID: 26703525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water-Fat MRI.
Sollmann N; Bonnheim NB; Joseph GB; Chachad R; Zhou J; Akkaya Z; Pirmoazen AM; Bailey JF; Guo X; Lazar AA; Link TM; Fields AJ; Krug R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Nov; 56(5):1600-1608. PubMed ID: 35285561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
