342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35246079)
1. Transvaginal single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
Li J; Sima Y; Hu C; Wang X; Lu Z; Hua K; Chen Y
BMC Surg; 2022 Mar; 22(1):82. PubMed ID: 35246079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between laparoscopic uterus/sacrocolpopexy and total pelvic floor reconstruction with vaginal mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Wei D; Wang P; Niu X; Zhao X
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Apr; 45(4):915-922. PubMed ID: 30652385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transvaginal single-port laparoscopic pelvic reconstruction with Y-shaped mesh: experiences of 93 cases.
Li J; Hu C; Wang X; Hua K; Chen Y
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):905-911. PubMed ID: 32737533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Sato H; Abe H; Ikeda A; Miyagawa T; Sato K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Jan; 41(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 32148120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transvaginal Single-Port Laparoscopy Sacrocolpopexy.
Chen Y; Li J; Zhang Y; Hua K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(4):585-588. PubMed ID: 29107118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
van Oudheusden AMJ; Eissing J; Terink IM; Vink MDH; van Kuijk SMJ; Bongers MY; Coolen AWM
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 36112182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for middle compartment prolapse.
Chen Y; Hua K
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 May; 137(2):164-169. PubMed ID: 28099748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for treatment of multi-compartmental pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review.
Ichikawa M; Kaseki H; Akira S
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2018 Feb; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 29485251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review comparing different approaches to pelvic floor repair.
Antosh DD; Dieter AA; Balk EM; Kanter G; Kim-Fine S; Meriwether KV; Mamik MM; Good MM; Singh R; Alas A; Foda MA; Rahn DD; Rogers RG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):475.e1-475.e19. PubMed ID: 34087227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transvaginal extraperitoneal single-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse after total/subtotal hysterectomy: Chinese surgeons' initial experience.
Lu Z; Chen Y; Xiao C; Hua K; Hu C
BMC Surg; 2024 Jan; 24(1):25. PubMed ID: 38229131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posterior Compartment Surgery Provides No Differential Benefit for Defecatory Symptoms Before or After Concomitant Mesh-Augmented Apical Suspension.
Arunachalam D; Hale DS; Heit MH
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(2):183-187. PubMed ID: 29319557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus pelvic organ prolapse suspension for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study.
Tagliaferri V; Taccaliti C; Romano F; D'Asta M; Martulli B; Gentile C; Legge F; Ruggieri S; Guido M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2075-2081. PubMed ID: 35129036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.
Yan L; Lu S; Zhao C; Lei L; Liu L
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 30(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 36563872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Medium-term outcomes 2 years after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
Sato H; Otsuka S; Abe H; Tsukada S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Oct; 42(7):3336-3341. PubMed ID: 36149283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
