These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35246872)

  • 1. A prospective, multicentre study of 6-mm short implants in posterior alveolar bone supporting splinted crowns: A 5-year follow-up study.
    Sui H; Tang Z; Zhang X; Wei D; Meng H; Han J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2022 Jun; 49(6):537-546. PubMed ID: 35246872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Split-Mouth Comparison of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses on Short Implants: 3-Year Results.
    Clelland N; Chaudhry J; Rashid RG; McGlumphy E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 27632270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of splinting crowns on short implants in the mandible 3 years after loading.
    Al-Sawaf O; Tuna T; Rittich A; Kern T; Wolfart S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Nov; 31(11):1061-1071. PubMed ID: 33463774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival rates of ultra-short (<6 mm) compared with short locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas: A 5-year retrospective study.
    Lombardo G; Signoriello A; Marincola M; Liboni P; Bonfante EA; Nocini PF
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Dec; 23(6):904-919. PubMed ID: 34796619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term clinical performance of short 6-mm implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region: A 10-year cohort study.
    Bregagnol RB; Coltro MPL; Villarinho EA; Triches DF; Alonso FR; Mezzomo LAM; de Macedo BB; Teixeira ER; Vigo A; Shinkai RSA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Feb; 26(1):158-169. PubMed ID: 37882144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short vs. Standard Laser-Microgrooved Implants Supporting Single and Splinted Crowns: A Prospective Study with 3 Years Follow-Up.
    Guarnieri R; Di Nardo D; Gaimari G; Miccoli G; Testarelli L
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e771-e779. PubMed ID: 30168651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short and ultra-short (<6-mm) locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas (part II): A 5-year retrospective study on periodontally healthy patients and patients with a history of periodontitis.
    Lombardo G; Signoriello A; Pardo A; Serpa Romero XZ; Vila Sierra LA; Arévalo Tovar L; Marincola M; Nocini PF
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Aug; 24(4):455-467. PubMed ID: 35635514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study.
    Tang Y; Yu H; Wang J; Gao M; Qiu L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 22(1):119-127. PubMed ID: 31908138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early loading of single crowns supported by 6-mm-long implants with a moderately rough surface: a prospective 2-year follow-up cohort study.
    Rossi F; Ricci E; Marchetti C; Lang NP; Botticelli D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):937-43. PubMed ID: 20701620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short (5 and 7 mm long) porous implant in the posterior atrophic mandible: a 5-year report of a prospective study.
    Perelli M; Abundo R; Corrente G; Saccone C
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 22282732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R; Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Piatelli M; Corvino V; Barausse C; Buti J; Soardi E; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):359-72. PubMed ID: 24570981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R; Felice P; Piattelli M; Gessaroli M; Soardi E; Barausse C; Buti J; Corvino V
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 24570980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective, multicenter study assessing the DENTSPLY Implants, OsseoSpeed(™) TX, length 6 mm in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year follow-up study.
    Han J; Zhang X; Tang Z; Zhang L; Shi D; Meng H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):452-7. PubMed ID: 25855871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns versus 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in Dubai Health Authority: a retrospective study.
    Alhammadi SH; Burnside G; Milosevic A
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Apr; 21(1):171. PubMed ID: 33794841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: One-year post-loading results from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Checchi L; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Sammartino G; Masi I; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 27022635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Bolle C; Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 29557399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical observation of the curative effect after 5-year follow-up of single tooth implant-supported restorations in the posterior region].
    Liang F; Wu MJ; Zou LD
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):970-976. PubMed ID: 34650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term follow-up of single crowns supported by short, moderately rough implants-A prospective 10-year cohort study.
    Rossi F; Lang NP; Ricci E; Ferraioli L; Baldi N; Botticelli D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1212-1219. PubMed ID: 30430655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Analysis of Peri-Implant Bone Loss in Extra-Short, Short, and Conventional Implants. A 3-Year Retrospective Study.
    Estévez-Pérez D; Bustamante-Hernández N; Labaig-Rueda C; Solá-Ruíz MF; Amengual-Lorenzo J; García-Sala Bonmatí F; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Agustín-Panadero R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(24):. PubMed ID: 33322472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.