172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35246872)
1. A prospective, multicentre study of 6-mm short implants in posterior alveolar bone supporting splinted crowns: A 5-year follow-up study.
Sui H; Tang Z; Zhang X; Wei D; Meng H; Han J
J Clin Periodontol; 2022 Jun; 49(6):537-546. PubMed ID: 35246872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Split-Mouth Comparison of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses on Short Implants: 3-Year Results.
Clelland N; Chaudhry J; Rashid RG; McGlumphy E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 27632270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of splinting crowns on short implants in the mandible 3 years after loading.
Al-Sawaf O; Tuna T; Rittich A; Kern T; Wolfart S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Nov; 31(11):1061-1071. PubMed ID: 33463774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival rates of ultra-short (<6 mm) compared with short locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas: A 5-year retrospective study.
Lombardo G; Signoriello A; Marincola M; Liboni P; Bonfante EA; Nocini PF
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Dec; 23(6):904-919. PubMed ID: 34796619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term clinical performance of short 6-mm implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region: A 10-year cohort study.
Bregagnol RB; Coltro MPL; Villarinho EA; Triches DF; Alonso FR; Mezzomo LAM; de Macedo BB; Teixeira ER; Vigo A; Shinkai RSA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Feb; 26(1):158-169. PubMed ID: 37882144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short vs. Standard Laser-Microgrooved Implants Supporting Single and Splinted Crowns: A Prospective Study with 3 Years Follow-Up.
Guarnieri R; Di Nardo D; Gaimari G; Miccoli G; Testarelli L
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e771-e779. PubMed ID: 30168651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short and ultra-short (<6-mm) locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas (part II): A 5-year retrospective study on periodontally healthy patients and patients with a history of periodontitis.
Lombardo G; Signoriello A; Pardo A; Serpa Romero XZ; Vila Sierra LA; Arévalo Tovar L; Marincola M; Nocini PF
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Aug; 24(4):455-467. PubMed ID: 35635514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: A 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study.
Tang Y; Yu H; Wang J; Gao M; Qiu L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 22(1):119-127. PubMed ID: 31908138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early loading of single crowns supported by 6-mm-long implants with a moderately rough surface: a prospective 2-year follow-up cohort study.
Rossi F; Ricci E; Marchetti C; Lang NP; Botticelli D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):937-43. PubMed ID: 20701620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short (5 and 7 mm long) porous implant in the posterior atrophic mandible: a 5-year report of a prospective study.
Perelli M; Abundo R; Corrente G; Saccone C
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 22282732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Pistilli R; Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Piatelli M; Corvino V; Barausse C; Buti J; Soardi E; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):359-72. PubMed ID: 24570981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Pistilli R; Felice P; Piattelli M; Gessaroli M; Soardi E; Barausse C; Buti J; Corvino V
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 24570980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, multicenter study assessing the DENTSPLY Implants, OsseoSpeed(™) TX, length 6 mm in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year follow-up study.
Han J; Zhang X; Tang Z; Zhang L; Shi D; Meng H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):452-7. PubMed ID: 25855871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns versus 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in Dubai Health Authority: a retrospective study.
Alhammadi SH; Burnside G; Milosevic A
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Apr; 21(1):171. PubMed ID: 33794841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posterior jaws rehabilitated with partial prostheses supported by 4.0 x 4.0 mm or by longer implants: One-year post-loading results from a multicenter randomised controlled trial.
Felice P; Checchi L; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Sammartino G; Masi I; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 27022635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Bolle C; Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 29557399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical observation of the curative effect after 5-year follow-up of single tooth implant-supported restorations in the posterior region].
Liang F; Wu MJ; Zou LD
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):970-976. PubMed ID: 34650304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term follow-up of single crowns supported by short, moderately rough implants-A prospective 10-year cohort study.
Rossi F; Lang NP; Ricci E; Ferraioli L; Baldi N; Botticelli D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1212-1219. PubMed ID: 30430655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative Analysis of Peri-Implant Bone Loss in Extra-Short, Short, and Conventional Implants. A 3-Year Retrospective Study.
Estévez-Pérez D; Bustamante-Hernández N; Labaig-Rueda C; Solá-Ruíz MF; Amengual-Lorenzo J; García-Sala Bonmatí F; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Agustín-Panadero R
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(24):. PubMed ID: 33322472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
