185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35247063)
1. Diagnosis and staging of cardiac masses: additional value of CMR with
Mikail N; Males L; Hyafil F; Benali K; Deschamps L; Brochet E; Ehmer C; Driss AB; Saker L; Rossi A; Alkhoder S; Raffoul R; Rouzet F; Ou P
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Jun; 49(7):2232-2241. PubMed ID: 35247063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 18F-FDG PET/CT role in staging of gastric carcinomas: comparison with conventional contrast enhancement computed tomography.
Altini C; Niccoli Asabella A; Di Palo A; Fanelli M; Ferrari C; Moschetta M; Rubini G
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 May; 94(20):e864. PubMed ID: 25997066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis in the restaging of patient with ovarian cancer as compared to contrast enhanced CT and tumor marker Ca-125.
Rubini G; Altini C; Notaristefano A; Merenda N; Rubini D; Ianora AA; Asabella AN
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2014; 33(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23948509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in comparison with CECT for whole-body assessment of patients with esophageal cancer.].
Altini C; Niccoli Asabella A; Lavelli V; Bianco G; Ungaro A; Pisani A; Merenda N; Ferrari C; Rubini G
Recenti Prog Med; 2019 Mar; 110(3):144-150. PubMed ID: 30968855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Whole-body
Gajjala SR; Hulikal N; Kadiyala S; Kottu R; Kalawat T
Indian J Med Res; 2018 Mar; 147(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 29923514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography with 18-FDG in identifying malignant solitary pulmonary nodules.
Dabrowska M; Krenke R; Korczynski P; Maskey-Warzechowska M; Zukowska M; Kunikowska J; Orłowski T; Chazan R
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Apr; 94(15):e666. PubMed ID: 25881842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multimodality imaging to distinguish between benign and malignant cardiac masses.
Aghayev A; Cheezum MK; Steigner ML; Mousavi N; Padera R; Barac A; Kwong RY; Di Carli MF; Blankstein R
J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1504-1517. PubMed ID: 34476778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography performs better than contrast-enhanced computed tomography for metastasis evaluation in the initial staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Santhosh S; Mittal BR; Bhasin DK; Rana SS; Gupta R; Das A; Nada R
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Oct; 31(8):575-581. PubMed ID: 28689356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic value of integrated ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: accuracy of patient selection for secondary cytoreduction in 134 patients.
Lee YJ; Kim YM; Jung PS; Lee JJ; Kim JK; Kim YT; Nam JH
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 May; 29(3):e36. PubMed ID: 29400023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CECT vs. CECT for detecting recurrence of periampullary carcinoma and its prognostic significance.
Santhosh S; Mittal BR; Kang M; Kapoor R; Gupta R; Rana S; Bhattacharya A; Bhasin D
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jun; 40(5):1131-7. PubMed ID: 25655637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Tissue Characterization for Cancer-Associated Cardiac Masses: Metabolic and Prognostic Manifestations in Relation to Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography.
Chan AT; Fox J; Perez Johnston R; Kim J; Brouwer LR; Grizzard J; Kim RJ; Matasar M; Shia J; Moskowitz CS; Steingart R; Weinsaft JW
J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 May; 8(10):e011709. PubMed ID: 31072171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Solid splenic masses: evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Metser U; Miller E; Kessler A; Lerman H; Lievshitz G; Oren R; Even-Sapir E
J Nucl Med; 2005 Jan; 46(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 15632034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Added value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for staging of advanced gastric cancer: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MDCT.
Kawanaka Y; Kitajima K; Fukushima K; Mouri M; Doi H; Oshima T; Niwa H; Kaibe N; Sasako M; Tomita T; Miwa H; Hirota S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):989-95. PubMed ID: 27130061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective evaluation of whole-body MRI and
Bruckmann NM; Sawicki LM; Kirchner J; Martin O; Umutlu L; Herrmann K; Fendler W; Bittner AK; Hoffmann O; Mohrmann S; Dietzel F; Ingenwerth M; Schaarschmidt BM; Li Y; Kowall B; Stang A; Antoch G; Buchbender C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Nov; 47(12):2816-2825. PubMed ID: 32333068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic and prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in comparison with morphological imaging in primary adrenal gland malignancies - a multicenter experience.
Cistaro A; Niccoli Asabella A; Coppolino P; Quartuccio N; Altini C; Cucinotta M; Alongi P; Balma M; Sanfilippo S; Buschiazzo A; Piccardo A; Fanelli M; Sambuceti G; Bomanji J; Baldari S; Bisi G; Fanti S; Rubini G
Hell J Nucl Med; 2015; 18(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 26187207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cardiac Computed Tomography and 18-F Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Cardiac Masses.
D'Angelo EC; Paolisso P; Vitale G; Foà A; Bergamaschi L; Magnani I; Saturi G; Rinaldi A; Toniolo S; Renzulli M; Attinà D; Lovato L; Lima GM; Bonfiglioli R; Fanti S; Leone O; Saponara M; Pantaleo MA; Rucci P; Di Marco L; Pacini D; Pizzi C; Galiè N
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Nov; 13(11):2400-2411. PubMed ID: 32563654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17.
Qin C; Shao F; Hu F; Song W; Song Y; Guo J; Lan X
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 31807883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in characterizing ovarian lesions and staging ovarian cancer: correlation with transvaginal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and histology.
Castellucci P; Perrone AM; Picchio M; Ghi T; Farsad M; Nanni C; Messa C; Meriggiola MC; Pelusi G; Al-Nahhas A; Rubello D; Fazio F; Fanti S
Nucl Med Commun; 2007 Aug; 28(8):589-95. PubMed ID: 17625380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic value of
Tsuyoshi H; Tsujikawa T; Yamada S; Okazawa H; Yoshida Y
Cancer Imaging; 2020 Oct; 20(1):75. PubMed ID: 33092631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT as a post-treatment tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT.
Suenaga Y; Kitajima K; Ishihara T; Sasaki R; Otsuki N; Nibu K; Minamikawa T; Kiyota N; Sugimura K
Eur Radiol; 2016 Apr; 26(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 26188656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
