These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35248227)

  • 1. Editorial Commentary: All-Suture Anchor for Shoulder Biceps Tenodesis Results in Excellent Outcomes.
    Hong CK; Su WR
    Arthroscopy; 2022 Mar; 38(3):735-736. PubMed ID: 35248227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.
    Tashjian RZ; Henninger HB
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1408-12. PubMed ID: 23415819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editorial Commentary: Size Matters: Biomechanical Analysis of All-Suture Suture-Anchor Fixation Compared to Conventional Suture Anchors and Interference Screws for Biceps Tenodesis.
    Taylor SA
    Arthroscopy; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1769-1770. PubMed ID: 31159962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suprapectoral or subpectoral position for biceps tenodesis: biomechanical comparison of four different techniques in both positions.
    Patzer T; Santo G; Olender GD; Wellmann M; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Jan; 21(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 21493102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editorial Commentary: How Can I Tenodese the Biceps Tendon of the Shoulder? Let Me Count the Ways.
    Werner BC
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1762-1763. PubMed ID: 29804600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interference screw vs. suture anchor fixation for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: does it matter?
    Millett PJ; Sanders B; Gobezie R; Braun S; Warner JJ
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2008 Sep; 9():121. PubMed ID: 18793424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis.
    Papp DF; Skelley NW; Sutter EG; Ji JH; Wierks CH; Belkoff SM; McFarland EG
    Orthopedics; 2011 Jul; 34(7):e275-8. PubMed ID: 21717988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.
    Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Lin CL; Yeh ML; Su WR
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 29482858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical Comparison of All-Suture Anchor Fixation and Interference Screw Technique for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
    Chiang FL; Hong CK; Chang CH; Lin CL; Jou IM; Su WR
    Arthroscopy; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1247-52. PubMed ID: 27039966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biceps Tenodesis: Biomechanical Assessment of 3 Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Techniques.
    Vestermark G; Hartigan D; Piasecki D; Fleischli J; Odum SM; Zheng N; D'Alessandro DF
    Orthopedics; 2017 Nov; 40(6):e1009-e1016. PubMed ID: 28968479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are Implant Choice and Surgical Approach Associated With Biceps Tenodesis Construct Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-regression.
    Aida HF; Shi BY; Huish EG; McFarland EG; Srikumaran U
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Apr; 48(5):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 31585053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. All-suture anchor size and drill angle influence load to failure in a porcine model of subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a biomechanical study.
    Alt PS; Marx C; Braun S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 May; 25(1):408. PubMed ID: 38783272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a new technique using an all-suture anchor fixation.
    Su WR; Ling FY; Hong CK; Chang CH; Lin CL; Jou IM
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Feb; 23(2):596-9. PubMed ID: 25274091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis of the Shoulder: Indications and Technique Options.
    Nuelle CW; Sheean A; Tucker CJ
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Sep; 36(9):2352-2353. PubMed ID: 32325099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Editorial Commentary: What Is More Important: Strength or Displacement? Findings of All-Suture Anchor Versus Interference Screw for Biceps Tenodesis.
    Provencher MT; Peebles AM
    Arthroscopy; 2021 Oct; 37(10):3022-3024. PubMed ID: 34602145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Interconnected Knotless Anchor for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis Could Offer Improved Biomechanical Properties in a Cadaveric Model.
    Kuan FC; Hsu KL; Yen JZ; Wen MJ; Yeh ML; Chen Y; Su WR
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Aug; 36(8):2047-2054. PubMed ID: 32259645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Editorial Commentary: Biceps Tenodesis Fixation: Screw, Button, or None of the Above?
    Frank RM
    Arthroscopy; 2020 May; 36(5):1261-1263. PubMed ID: 32370888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Arthroscopic extra-articular suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with knotless suture anchor.
    Kongmalai P
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):493-497. PubMed ID: 30145670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and sonographic evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis with a dual suture anchor technique demonstrates improved outcomes and a low failure rate at a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Jacxsens M; Granger EK; Tashjian RZ
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Jan; 138(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 29038845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The biomechanical performance of a new forked knotless biceps tenodesis compared to a knotless and suture anchor tenodesis.
    Lorbach O; Trennheuser C; Kohn D; Anagnostakos K
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jul; 24(7):2174-80. PubMed ID: 25293677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.