These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35248474)

  • 1. [Assessment of positive surgical margins in the management of patients after radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer].
    Saïer E; Pinar U; De La Taille A; Irani J; Salomon L
    Prog Urol; 2022 Apr; 32(5):354-362. PubMed ID: 35248474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer prognosis].
    Tambwe Kayombo R; Léon P; Lasserre T; Fournier R; Branchu B; Hulin M; Durlach A; Larré S
    Prog Urol; 2021 Oct; 31(12):709-715. PubMed ID: 33941458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Not Available].
    Susperregui J; Pierry C; Bonhomme B; Pasticier G; Bernhard JC; Capon G; Bensadoun H; Ballanger P; Ferrière JM; Robert G
    Prog Urol; 2017 Oct; 27(12):632-639. PubMed ID: 28869168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence free survival after radical prostatectomy with positive surgical margins].
    Roux V; Eyraud R; Brureau L; Gourtaud G; Senechal C; Fofana M; Blanchet P
    Prog Urol; 2017; 27(8-9):467-473. PubMed ID: 28576421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of biochemical recurrence and positive surgical margins in patients with pT2 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Røder MA; Thomsen FB; Berg KD; Christensen IB; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
    J Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 109(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 24155174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extent of positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy: impact on biochemical recurrence with long-term follow-up.
    Koskas Y; Lannes F; Branger N; Giusiano S; Guibert N; Pignot G; Walz J; Rossi D; Bastide C
    BMC Urol; 2019 May; 19(1):37. PubMed ID: 31092240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-apical positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer is associated with the highest risk of recurrence.
    Røder MA; Kawa S; Scheike T; Toft BG; Hansen JB; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
    J Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 109(8):818-22. PubMed ID: 24522971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First Danish single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: impact of surgical margins on biochemical outcome.
    Vrang ML; Røder MA; Vainer B; Christensen IJ; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Iversen P
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2012 Jun; 46(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 22320899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer at Rigshospitalet 1995-2011 - an analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.
    Røder MA
    Dan Med J; 2013 Dec; 60(12):B4752. PubMed ID: 24355454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?
    Pettenati C; Neuzillet Y; Radulescu C; Hervé JM; Molinié V; Lebret T
    World J Urol; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1973-8. PubMed ID: 25939539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy on Disease Progression and Adjuvant Treatment in Pathologically Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Tomasković I; Milicić V; Tomić M; Ruzić B; Ulamec M
    Coll Antropol; 2015 Sep; 39(3):697-700. PubMed ID: 26898068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomised Trial of Adjuvant Radiotherapy Following Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radical Prostatectomy Alone in Prostate Cancer Patients with Positive Margins or Extracapsular Extension.
    Hackman G; Taari K; Tammela TL; Matikainen M; Kouri M; Joensuu T; Luukkaala T; Salonen A; Isotalo T; Pétas A; Hendolin N; Boström PJ; Aaltomaa S; Lehtoranta K; Hellström P; Riikonen J; Korpela M; Minn H; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL; Pukkala E; Hemminki A;
    Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 31375279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Hashimoto T; Nakashima J; Inoue R; Komori O; Yamaguchi Y; Kashima T; Satake N; Nakagami Y; Namiki K; Nagao T; Ohno Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 25(2):377-383. PubMed ID: 31673831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive factors associated with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy for pathological T2 prostate cancer with negative surgical margins.
    Aoun F; Albisinni S; Henriet B; Tombal B; Van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T
    Scand J Urol; 2017 Feb; 51(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27910728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.
    Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Suh J; Macklis R; Klein E
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 9099457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.
    Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.