BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35249280)

  • 1. [Diagnostic value of MDM2 RNA in situ hybridization in atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma].
    Chen C; He X; Jing WY; Qiu Y; Chen M; Luo TY; Liu XY; Chen HJ; Zhang HY; Bu H
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Mar; 51(3):190-195. PubMed ID: 35249280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expression of FRS2 in atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: an immunohistochemical analysis of 182 cases with genetic data.
    Jing W; Lan T; Qiu Y; Peng R; Lu Y; Chen H; Chen M; He X; Chen C; Zhang H
    Diagn Pathol; 2021 Oct; 16(1):96. PubMed ID: 34696768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MDM2 RNA In Situ Hybridization for the Diagnosis of Atypical Lipomatous Tumor: A Study Evaluating DNA, RNA, and Protein Expression.
    Kulkarni AS; Wojcik JB; Chougule A; Arora K; Chittampalli Y; Kurzawa P; Mullen JT; Chebib I; Nielsen GP; Rivera MN; Ting DT; Deshpande V
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2019 Apr; 43(4):446-454. PubMed ID: 30520819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amplification of FRS2 in atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma and de-differentiated liposarcoma: a clinicopathological and genetic study of 146 cases.
    Jing W; Lan T; Chen H; Zhang Z; Chen M; Peng R; He X; Zhang H
    Histopathology; 2018 Jun; 72(7):1145-1155. PubMed ID: 29368794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Atypical lipomatous tumor/well differentiated liposarcoma and related mimics with updates. When is molecular testing most cost-effective, necessary, and indicated?
    Kilpatrick SE
    Hum Pathol; 2024 May; 147():82-91. PubMed ID: 38135062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect MDM2 amplification in liposarcomas and their morphological mimics.
    Kimura H; Dobashi Y; Nojima T; Nakamura H; Yamamoto N; Tsuchiya H; Ikeda H; Sawada-Kitamura S; Oyama T; Ooi A
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2013; 6(7):1306-16. PubMed ID: 23826411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The value of MDM2 and CDK4 amplification levels using real-time polymerase chain reaction for the differential diagnosis of liposarcomas and their histologic mimickers.
    Shimada S; Ishizawa T; Ishizawa K; Matsumura T; Hasegawa T; Hirose T
    Hum Pathol; 2006 Sep; 37(9):1123-9. PubMed ID: 16938516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Atypical Lipomatous Tumor/Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma With Features Mimicking Spindle Cell Lipoma.
    Jebastin JAS; Perry KD; Chitale DA; Mott MP; Sanchez J; Fritchie KJ; Palanisamy N; Williamson SR
    Int J Surg Pathol; 2020 May; 28(3):336-340. PubMed ID: 31672072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential diagnosis of atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: utility of p16 in combination with MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry.
    Kammerer-Jacquet SF; Thierry S; Cabillic F; Lannes M; Burtin F; Henno S; Dugay F; Bouzillé G; Rioux-Leclercq N; Belaud-Rotureau MA; Stock N
    Hum Pathol; 2017 Jan; 59():34-40. PubMed ID: 27597521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MDM2 and CDK4 Immunohistochemistry: Should It Be Used in Problematic Differentiated Lipomatous Tumors?: A New Perspective.
    Clay MR; Martinez AP; Weiss SW; Edgar MA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Dec; 40(12):1647-1652. PubMed ID: 27508976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of
    Rekhi B; Karnik N; Agrawal R; Shetty O; Patkar S
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2022; 65(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 35074968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel sclerosing atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma in a 7-year-old girl: report of a case with molecular confirmation.
    Peng R; Chen H; Yang X; Zhang X; Zhang Z; He X; Zhang H
    Hum Pathol; 2018 Jan; 71():41-46. PubMed ID: 28705709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MRI characteristics of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma: retrospective comparison with histology and MDM2 gene amplification.
    Brisson M; Kashima T; Delaney D; Tirabosco R; Clarke A; Cro S; Flanagan AM; O'Donnell P
    Skeletal Radiol; 2013 May; 42(5):635-47. PubMed ID: 22987247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dysplastic lipoma: potential diagnostic pitfall of using MDM2 RNA in situ hybridization to distinguish between lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor.
    Hung YP; Michal M; Dubuc AM; Rosenberg AE; Nielsen GP
    Hum Pathol; 2020 Jul; 101():53-57. PubMed ID: 32439322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of MDM2 gene amplification or protein expression distinguishes sclerosing mesenteritis and retroperitoneal fibrosis from inflammatory well-differentiated liposarcoma.
    Weaver J; Goldblum JR; Turner S; Tubbs RR; Wang WL; Lazar AJ; Rubin BP
    Mod Pathol; 2009 Jan; 22(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 18836421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lessons learnt from MDM2 fluorescence in-situ hybridisation analysis of 439 mature lipomatous lesions with an emphasis on atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma lacking cytological atypia.
    Vargas AC; Joy C; Cheah AL; Jones M; Bonar F; Brookwell R; Garrone B; Talbot J; Harraway J; Gill AJ; Maclean FM
    Histopathology; 2022 Jan; 80(2):369-380. PubMed ID: 34523152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential diagnosis of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma by cytological analysis.
    Sugiyama K; Washimi K; Sato S; Hiruma T; Sakai M; Okubo Y; Miyagi Y; Yokose T
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2022 Mar; 50(3):112-122. PubMed ID: 34984861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MDM2 Amplification in Problematic Lipomatous Tumors: Analysis of FISH Testing Criteria.
    Clay MR; Martinez AP; Weiss SW; Edgar MA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Oct; 39(10):1433-9. PubMed ID: 26146760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic value of MDM2 RNA in situ hybridization for low-grade osteosarcoma: Consistency comparison of RNA in situ hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry.
    Chen C; He X; Chen M; Du T; Qin W; Jing W; Zhang H
    Virchows Arch; 2023 Jun; 482(6):999-1010. PubMed ID: 36977943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic utility of p16, CDK4, and MDM2 as an immunohistochemical panel in distinguishing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas from other adipocytic tumors.
    Thway K; Flora R; Shah C; Olmos D; Fisher C
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Mar; 36(3):462-9. PubMed ID: 22301498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.