These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35249616)

  • 21. Roadside Drug Testing Approaches.
    Alhefeiti MA; Barker J; Shah I
    Molecules; 2021 May; 26(11):. PubMed ID: 34072538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prevalence of alcohol-impaired driving and riding in northern Ghana.
    Damsere-Derry J; Palk G; King M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 26147962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are perceptions of penalties stable across time? The problem of causal ordering in deterrence applied to road safety.
    Truelove V; Freeman J; Watson B; Kaye SA; Davey J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105746. PubMed ID: 32919221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Roadside survey of alcohol and drug use among Norwegian drivers in 2016-2017: A follow-up of the 2008-2009 survey.
    Furuhaugen H; Jamt REG; Nilsson G; Vindenes V; Gjerde H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(6):555-562. PubMed ID: 29927625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceptions and experiences of random breath testing in Queensland and the self-reported deterrent impact on drunk driving.
    Watson B; Freeman J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2007 Mar; 8(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 17366331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marijuana use and driving in Washington State: Risk perceptions and behaviors before and after implementation of retail sales.
    Eichelberger AH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 30822133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Risk perceptions and DUI decisions of drivers in different legal environments: New evidence on differential deterrence from a Chinese sample.
    Yao J; Xiao T; Hou S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106188. PubMed ID: 34000676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Age, gender and deterrability: Are younger male drivers more likely to discount the future?
    Freeman J; Kaye SA; Truelove V; Davey J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():1-9. PubMed ID: 28441520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The on-road experiences and awareness of sleepiness in a sample of Australian highway drivers: A roadside driver sleepiness study.
    Watling CN; Armstrong KA; Smith SS; Wilson A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25834934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Alcohol-Impaired Driving and Perceived Risks of Legal Consequences.
    Sloan FA; McCutchan SA; Eldred LM
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2017 Feb; 41(2):432-442. PubMed ID: 28056493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Oral fluid testing for marijuana intoxication: enhancing objectivity for roadside DUI testing.
    Doucette ML; Frattaroli S; Vernick JS
    Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 24(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 28572268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An evaluation of immediate roadside prohibitions for drinking drivers in British Columbia: findings from roadside surveys.
    Beirness DJ; Beasley EE
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 24372494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Roadside drug testing would not be much of a deterrent.
    Winstock AR
    BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e2133. PubMed ID: 22438373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of enforcement intensity on alcohol impaired driving crashes.
    Fell JC; Waehrer G; Voas RB; Auld-Owens A; Carr K; Pell K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Dec; 73():181-6. PubMed ID: 25240134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Understanding the deterrent impact formal and informal sanctions have on illegal smartphone use while driving.
    Kaviani F; Young KL; Robards B; Koppel S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 145():105706. PubMed ID: 32768605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is law enforcement of drug-impaired driving cost-efficient? An explorative study of a methodology for cost-benefit analysis.
    Veisten K; Houwing S; Mathijssen MP; Akhtar J
    Int J Drug Policy; 2013 Mar; 24(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 23127668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Correlates of Marijuana Drugged Driving and Openness to Driving While High: Evidence from Colorado and Washington.
    Davis KC; Allen J; Duke J; Nonnemaker J; Bradfield B; Farrelly MC; Shafer P; Novak S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146853. PubMed ID: 26800209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A field test of substance use screening devices as part of routine drunk-driving spot detection operating procedures in South Africa.
    Matzopoulos R; Lasarow A; Bowman B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():118-24. PubMed ID: 23770390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does getting away with it count? An application of stafford and warr's reconceptualised model of deterrence to drink driving.
    Szogi E; Darvell M; Freeman J; Truelove V; Palk G; Davey J; Armstrong K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():261-267. PubMed ID: 28923516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Drink driving during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Watson-Brown N; Truelove V; Parker E; Davey J
    Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav; 2021 Apr; 78():369-380. PubMed ID: 36567963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.