158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35249756)
1. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit.
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit study group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 164(3):674-684.e5. PubMed ID: 35249756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.
Yanni F; Singh P; Tewari N; Parsons SL; Catton JA; Duffy J; Welch NT; Vohra RS
World J Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2483-2489. PubMed ID: 31222637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gu HY; Luo J; Qiang Y
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(1):242. PubMed ID: 37559141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increased Leak Rates Following Stapled Versus Handsewn Ileocolic Anastomosis in Patients with Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
Nordholm-Carstensen A; Schnack Rasmussen M; Krarup PM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 May; 62(5):542-548. PubMed ID: 30489322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Hand-sewn Versus Side-to-side Linear-stapled Versus Circular-stapled Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Schlottmann F; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Herbella FAM; Patti MG
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2022 Jun; 32(3):380-392. PubMed ID: 35583556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Urschel JD; Blewett CJ; Bennett WF; Miller JD; Young JE
Dis Esophagus; 2001; 14(3-4):212-7. PubMed ID: 11869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil.
Campos GM; Jablons D; Brown LM; Ramirez RM; Rabl C; Theodore P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 37(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 20153660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of stapled compared to handsewn repair on anastomotic outcomes in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Le KDR; Martin K; Read D
ANZ J Surg; 2024 Apr; 94(4):604-613. PubMed ID: 38456319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie A; Fitzgerald A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD004320. PubMed ID: 21901690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stapled vs handsewn anastomosis and anastomotic leaks in gastric cancer surgery-a population-based nationwide study in Finland.
Kvist E; Helminen O; Helmiö M; Huhta H; Jalkanen A; Junttila A; Kallio R; Koivukangas V; Kokkola A; Laine S; Lietzen E; Louhimo J; Meriläinen S; Pohjanen VM; Rantanen T; Ristimäki A; Räsänen JV; Saarnio J; Sihvo E; Toikkanen V; Tyrväinen T; Valtola A; Kauppila JH;
J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(6):820-823. PubMed ID: 38599994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie AE
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD004320. PubMed ID: 17636751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Sozzi A; Bonitta G; Lombardo F; Cavalli M; Cirri S; Campanelli G; Danelli P; Bona D
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3297-3309. PubMed ID: 36242619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis.
Walther B; Johansson J; Johnsson F; Von Holstein CS; Zilling T
Ann Surg; 2003 Dec; 238(6):803-12; discussion 812-4. PubMed ID: 14631217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
