These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35249756)

  • 1. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit.
    Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit study group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 164(3):674-684.e5. PubMed ID: 35249756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.
    Yanni F; Singh P; Tewari N; Parsons SL; Catton JA; Duffy J; Welch NT; Vohra RS
    World J Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2483-2489. PubMed ID: 31222637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gu HY; Luo J; Qiang Y
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(1):242. PubMed ID: 37559141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased Leak Rates Following Stapled Versus Handsewn Ileocolic Anastomosis in Patients with Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.
    Nordholm-Carstensen A; Schnack Rasmussen M; Krarup PM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 May; 62(5):542-548. PubMed ID: 30489322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Hand-sewn Versus Side-to-side Linear-stapled Versus Circular-stapled Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Schlottmann F; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Herbella FAM; Patti MG
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2022 Jun; 32(3):380-392. PubMed ID: 35583556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Urschel JD; Blewett CJ; Bennett WF; Miller JD; Young JE
    Dis Esophagus; 2001; 14(3-4):212-7. PubMed ID: 11869322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
    Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
    Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil.
    Campos GM; Jablons D; Brown LM; Ramirez RM; Rabl C; Theodore P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 37(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 20153660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
    Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie A; Fitzgerald A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD004320. PubMed ID: 21901690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stapled vs handsewn anastomosis and anastomotic leaks in gastric cancer surgery-a population-based nationwide study in Finland.
    Kvist E; Helminen O; Helmiö M; Huhta H; Jalkanen A; Junttila A; Kallio R; Koivukangas V; Kokkola A; Laine S; Lietzen E; Louhimo J; Meriläinen S; Pohjanen VM; Rantanen T; Ristimäki A; Räsänen JV; Saarnio J; Sihvo E; Toikkanen V; Tyrväinen T; Valtola A; Kauppila JH;
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(6):820-823. PubMed ID: 38599994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
    Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.
    Choy PY; Bissett IP; Docherty JG; Parry BR; Merrie AE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD004320. PubMed ID: 17636751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Aiolfi A; Sozzi A; Bonitta G; Lombardo F; Cavalli M; Cirri S; Campanelli G; Danelli P; Bona D
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3297-3309. PubMed ID: 36242619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis.
    Walther B; Johansson J; Johnsson F; Von Holstein CS; Zilling T
    Ann Surg; 2003 Dec; 238(6):803-12; discussion 812-4. PubMed ID: 14631217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
    Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
    Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
    Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
    Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anastomotic leakage after intrathoracic versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis for oesophageal carcinoma in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study.
    Liu YJ; Fan J; He HH; Zhu SS; Chen QL; Cao RH
    BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021025. PubMed ID: 30181184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.