These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35250141)
1. Compatibility and correlation of multi-attribute decision making: a case of industrial relocation. Martino Neto J; Salomon VAP; Ortiz-Barrios MA; Petrillo A Ann Oper Res; 2022 Feb; ():1-22. PubMed ID: 35250141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. TOPSIS-based entropy measure for intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy sets and application to multi-attribute decision making. Zheng YF; Xu J; Chen HZ Math Biosci Eng; 2020 Aug; 17(5):5604-5617. PubMed ID: 33120568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection. Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T Springerplus; 2016; 5():263. PubMed ID: 27006872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MADM method based on TOPSIS and grey correlation analysis. Bu FK; He J; Li HR; Fu Q Math Biosci Eng; 2020 Aug; 17(5):5584-5603. PubMed ID: 33120567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using multi-attribute decision-making approaches in the selection of a hospital management system. Arasteh MA; Shamshirband S; Yee PL Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(2):279-295. PubMed ID: 29309042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of infectious diseases and clinical microbiology specialists' preferences for hand hygiene: analysis using the multi-attribute utility theory and the analytic hierarchy process methods. Suner A; Oruc OE; Buke C; Ozkaya HD; Kitapcioglu G BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Aug; 17(1):129. PubMed ID: 28859640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS. Chen CH Entropy (Basel); 2020 Feb; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33286032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ranking the strategies for Indian medical tourism sector through the integration of SWOT analysis and TOPSIS method. Ajmera P Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2017 Oct; 30(8):668-679. PubMed ID: 28958199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cobot selection using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS based multi-criteria decision making technique for fuel filter assembly process. C S; Subramaniam SK Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e26374. PubMed ID: 38390129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multi-attribute decision making method using advanced Pythagorean fuzzy weighted geometric operator and their applications for real estate company selection. Paul TK; Pal M; Jana C Heliyon; 2021 Jun; 7(6):e07340. PubMed ID: 34195440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of the most appropriate fertilizing method for apple trees using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches. Heidarisoltanabadi M; Elhami B; Imanmehr A; Khadivi A Food Sci Nutr; 2024 Feb; 12(2):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 38370082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying the biologic closest to the ideal to treat chronic plaque psoriasis in different clinical scenarios: using a pilot multi-attribute decision model as a decision-support aid. Guibal F; Iversen L; Puig L; Strohal R; Williams P Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Dec; 25(12):2835-43. PubMed ID: 19916728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-Way Decision Models Based on Ideal Relations in Multi-Attribute Decision-Making. Chen X; Zou L Entropy (Basel); 2022 Jul; 24(7):. PubMed ID: 35885209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suitability evaluation of rural sewage treatment facilities in China considering lifcycle environmental impacts and regional differences. Jiang J; Hu X; Gu Y; Wang W; Bi Z; Yao C; Liang X; Wen Q; Luo M; Zheng Y; Xia X J Environ Manage; 2023 Oct; 344():118516. PubMed ID: 37413733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extension of correlation coefficient based TOPSIS technique for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy soft set: A case study in extract, transform, and load techniques. Zulqarnain RM; Siddique I; Asif M; Ahmad H; Askar S; Gurmani SH PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0287032. PubMed ID: 37903157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of feed stock for anaerobic digestion using MADM approach. Rao PV; Baral SS J Hazard Mater; 2011 Feb; 186(2-3):2009-16. PubMed ID: 21247688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comprehensive analysis of weighting and multicriteria methods in the context of sustainable energy. Şahin M Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran); 2021; 18(6):1591-1616. PubMed ID: 32952577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery. Hancerliogullari G; Hancerliogullari KO; Koksalmis E BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28114944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A New Decision Model Approach for Health Technology Assessment and A Case Study for Dialysis Alternatives in Turkey. Öztürk N; Tozan H; Vayvay Ö Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 32455609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]