These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35252930)
1. Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness? Chalmers PN; Christensen GV; Ishikawa H; Henninger HB; Kholmovski EG; Mills M; Tashjian RZ JSES Int; 2022 Mar; 6(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 35252930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Feasibility of using an inversion-recovery ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for quantification of glenoid bone loss. Ma YJ; West J; Nazaran A; Cheng X; Hoenecke H; Du J; Chang EY Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jul; 47(7):973-980. PubMed ID: 29396694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interobserver and intraobserver comparison of imaging glenoid morphology, glenoid version and humeral head subluxation. Cagle PJ; Werner B; Shukla DR; London DA; Parsons BO; Millar NL Shoulder Elbow; 2019 Jun; 11(3):204-209. PubMed ID: 31210792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A New Method for Measuring Glenoid Version on Standard Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Maister NJ; Hely A; Twycross LG; Gill SD; Page RS J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast; 2020; 4():2471549220926826. PubMed ID: 34497961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and Reliability of Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis and Quantification of Hill-Sachs Lesions: A Systematic Review. Vopat ML; Peebles LA; McBride T; Cirone I; Rider D; Provencher CMT Arthroscopy; 2021 Jan; 37(1):391-401. PubMed ID: 32798670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates With Computed Tomography for Glenoid Version Calculation Despite Lack of Visibility of Medial Scapula. Parada SA; Shaw KA; Antosh IJ; Eichinger JK; Li X; Curry EJ; Provencher MT Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 31864608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Normal Range of Humeral Head Positioning on the Glenoid on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Validation through Comparison of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Kim JH; Min YK Clin Shoulder Elb; 2018 Dec; 21(4):186-191. PubMed ID: 33330175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of humeral head deformity following neonatal brachial plexus palsy. Reading BD; Laor T; Salisbury SR; Lippert WC; Cornwall R J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(18):e136(1-8). PubMed ID: 22992884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging is comparable to computed tomography for determination of glenoid version but does not accurately distinguish between Walch B2 and C classifications. Lowe JT; Testa EJ; Li X; Miller S; DeAngelis JP; Jawa A J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Apr; 26(4):669-673. PubMed ID: 27765501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acromial morphology is not associated with rotator cuff tearing or repair healing. Chalmers PN; Beck L; Miller M; Kawakami J; Dukas AG; Burks RT; Greis PE; Tashjian RZ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Nov; 29(11):2229-2239. PubMed ID: 32417045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cortical bone thickness predicts the quantitative bone mineral density of the proximal humerus. Schmidutz F; Yan SG; Schopf C; Ihle C; Ahrend MD; Sprecher CM Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Feb; 16(1):33. PubMed ID: 33594610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT-like images based on T1 spoiled gradient-echo and ultra-short echo time MRI sequences for the assessment of vertebral fractures and degenerative bone changes of the spine. Schwaiger BJ; Schneider C; Kronthaler S; Gassert FT; Böhm C; Pfeiffer D; Baum T; Kirschke JS; Karampinos DC; Makowski MR; Woertler K; Wurm M; Gersing AS Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):4680-4689. PubMed ID: 33443599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Critical Findings on Magnetic Resonance Arthrograms in Posterior Shoulder Instability Compared With an Age-Matched Controlled Cohort. Galvin JW; Parada SA; Li X; Eichinger JK Am J Sports Med; 2016 Dec; 44(12):3222-3229. PubMed ID: 27528612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the measurement of glenoid bone loss. Gyftopoulos S; Hasan S; Bencardino J; Mayo J; Nayyar S; Babb J; Jazrawi L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Oct; 199(4):873-8. PubMed ID: 22997381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of neonatal lung parenchymal density via ultrashort echo time MRI with comparison to CT. Higano NS; Fleck RJ; Spielberg DR; Walkup LL; Hahn AD; Thomen RP; Merhar SL; Kingma PS; Tkach JA; Fain SB; Woods JC J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 46(4):992-1000. PubMed ID: 28160357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of glenoid track measurements. Schneider AK; Hoy GA; Ek ET; Rotstein AH; Tate J; Taylor DM; Evans MC J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Apr; 26(4):573-579. PubMed ID: 27989718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of Plain Radiographs Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Measure Tibial Slope in Sports Medicine Patients: Can They Be Used Interchangeably? Jahn R; Cooper JD; Juhan T; Kang HP; Bolia IK; Gamradt SC; Hatch GF; Weber AE Orthop J Sports Med; 2021 Oct; 9(10):23259671211033882. PubMed ID: 34646895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of articular cartilage thickness of the humeral head and the glenoid fossa by MR arthrography: anatomic correlation in cadavers. Yeh LR; Kwak S; Kim YS; Chou DS; Muhle C; Skaf A; Trudell D; Resnick D Skeletal Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(9):500-4. PubMed ID: 9809879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Qualitative and morphological evaluation of the mandibular bone using computed tomography. Priyadarshini SR; Sahoo PK; Niyogi S; Patnaik S; Bhuyan SK Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 33753661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]