These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35253558)

  • 21. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Educational Impact Drives Feasibility of Implementing Daily Assessment in the Workplace.
    Nathoo NA; Sidhu R; Gingerich A
    Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(4):389-398. PubMed ID: 32129088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Deprescribing medicines in older people living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: the TAILOR evidence synthesis.
    Reeve J; Maden M; Hill R; Turk A; Mahtani K; Wong G; Lasserson D; Krska J; Mangin D; Byng R; Wallace E; Ranson E
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 Jul; 26(32):1-148. PubMed ID: 35894932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The potential use of Bayesian Networks to support committee decisions in programmatic assessment.
    Zoanetti N; Pearce J
    Med Educ; 2021 Jul; 55(7):808-817. PubMed ID: 33151589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stakes in the eye of the beholder: an international study of learners' perceptions within programmatic assessment.
    Schut S; Driessen E; van Tartwijk J; van der Vleuten C; Heeneman S
    Med Educ; 2018 Jun; 52(6):654-663. PubMed ID: 29572920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Essential components of midwifery ethics education: results of a Delphi study.
    Megregian M; Low LK; Emeis C; de Vries R; Nieuwenhuijze M
    Midwifery; 2021 May; 96():102946. PubMed ID: 33610063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Priority setting and cardiac surgery: a qualitative case study.
    Walton NA; Martin DK; Peter EH; Pringle DM; Singer PA
    Health Policy; 2007 Mar; 80(3):444-58. PubMed ID: 16757057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can healthcare providers obtain judicial intervention against surrogates who demand "medically inappropriate" life support for incompetent patients?
    Cantor NL
    Crit Care Med; 1996 May; 24(5):883-7. PubMed ID: 8706470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Key considerations in planning and designing programmatic assessment in competency-based medical education.
    Ross S; Hauer KE; Wycliffe-Jones K; Hall AK; Molgaard L; Richardson D; Oswald A; Bhanji F;
    Med Teach; 2021 Jul; 43(7):758-764. PubMed ID: 34061700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Role of Parental Capacity for Medical Decision-Making in Medical Ethics and the Care of Psychiatrically Ill Youth: Case Report.
    Bieber ED; Edelsohn GA; McGee ME; Shekunov J; Romanowicz M; Vande Voort JL; McKean AJS
    Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():559263. PubMed ID: 33192675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A realist synthesis of prospective entrustment decision making by entrustment or clinical competency committees.
    Schumacher DJ; Michelson C; Winn AS; Turner DA; Martini A; Kinnear B
    Med Educ; 2024 Jul; 58(7):812-824. PubMed ID: 38088227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing tomorrow's learners: in competency-based education only a radically different holistic method of assessment will work. Six things we could forget.
    Schuwirth L; Ash J
    Med Teach; 2013 Jul; 35(7):555-9. PubMed ID: 23641916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improving skills development in residency using a deliberate-practice and learner-centered model.
    Bhatti NI; Ahmed A
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Oct; 125 Suppl 8():S1-14. PubMed ID: 26154861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?
    Tweed M; Wilkinson T
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):176. PubMed ID: 31146714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fairness: the hidden challenge for competency-based postgraduate medical education programs.
    Colbert CY; French JC; Herring ME; Dannefer EF
    Perspect Med Educ; 2017 Oct; 6(5):347-355. PubMed ID: 28516341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Algorithms in the court: does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated?
    BarysÄ— D; Sarel R
    Artif Intell Law (Dordr); 2023 Jan; ():1-30. PubMed ID: 36643574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Twelve tips for the implementation of EPAs for assessment and entrustment decisions.
    Peters H; Holzhausen Y; Boscardin C; Ten Cate O; Chen HC
    Med Teach; 2017 Aug; 39(8):802-807. PubMed ID: 28549405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning.
    Watling CJ; Ginsburg S
    Med Educ; 2019 Jan; 53(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 30073692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Value of Programmatic Assessment in Supporting Educators and Students to Succeed: A Qualitative Evaluation.
    Dart J; Twohig C; Anderson A; Bryce A; Collins J; Gibson S; Kleve S; Porter J; Volders E; Palermo C
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2021 Sep; 121(9):1732-1740. PubMed ID: 33612437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.