These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35253871)

  • 1. Expectations boost the reconstruction of auditory features from electrophysiological responses to noisy speech.
    Corcoran AW; Perera R; Koroma M; Kouider S; Hohwy J; Andrillon T
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Jan; 33(3):691-708. PubMed ID: 35253871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural Speech Tracking in the Theta and in the Delta Frequency Band Differentially Encode Clarity and Comprehension of Speech in Noise.
    Etard O; Reichenbach T
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 39(29):5750-5759. PubMed ID: 31109963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contributions of listening effort and intelligibility to cortical tracking of speech in adverse listening conditions.
    Ershaid H; Lizarazu M; McLaughlin D; Cooke M; Simantiraki O; Koutsogiannaki M; Lallier M
    Cortex; 2024 Mar; 172():54-71. PubMed ID: 38215511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural tracking measures of speech intelligibility: Manipulating intelligibility while keeping acoustics unchanged.
    Karunathilake IMD; Kulasingham JP; Simon JZ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Dec; 120(49):e2309166120. PubMed ID: 38032934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical auditory responses index the contributions of different RMS-level-dependent segments to speech intelligibility.
    Wang L; Li H; Wu EX; Chen F
    Hear Res; 2019 Nov; 383():107808. PubMed ID: 31606583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinct roles of delta- and theta-band neural tracking for sharpening and predictive coding of multi-level speech features during spoken language processing.
    Mai G; Wang WS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Dec; 44(17):6149-6172. PubMed ID: 37818940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Leading and following: Noise differently affects semantic and acoustic processing during naturalistic speech comprehension.
    Zhang X; Li J; Li Z; Hong B; Diao T; Ma X; Nolte G; Engel AK; Zhang D
    Neuroimage; 2023 Nov; 282():120404. PubMed ID: 37806465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two stages of speech envelope tracking in human auditory cortex modulated by speech intelligibility.
    Xu N; Zhao B; Luo L; Zhang K; Shao X; Luan G; Wang Q; Hu W; Wang Q
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Feb; 33(5):2215-2228. PubMed ID: 35695785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual learning of degraded speech by minimizing prediction error.
    Sohoglu E; Davis MH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(12):E1747-56. PubMed ID: 26957596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transient and sustained cortical activity elicited by connected speech of varying intelligibility.
    Tiitinen H; Miettinen I; Alku P; May PJ
    BMC Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 13():157. PubMed ID: 23276297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top-down influences of written text on perceived clarity of degraded speech.
    Sohoglu E; Peelle JE; Carlyon RP; Davis MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):186-99. PubMed ID: 23750966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eye Can Hear Clearly Now: Inverse Effectiveness in Natural Audiovisual Speech Processing Relies on Long-Term Crossmodal Temporal Integration.
    Crosse MJ; Di Liberto GM; Lalor EC
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9888-95. PubMed ID: 27656026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.
    Hunter CR
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1144-1157. PubMed ID: 32282402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of acoustic periodicity and intelligibility on the neural oscillations in response to speech.
    Steinmetzger K; Rosen S
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 95():173-181. PubMed ID: 27939190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cortical characterization of the perception of intelligible and unintelligible speech measured via high-density electroencephalography.
    Utianski RL; Caviness JN; Liss JM
    Brain Lang; 2015 Jan; 140():49-54. PubMed ID: 25513975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.