These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3525389)
1. Comparison of immunofluorescence and culture methods in the diagnosis of chlamydial infections. Manoharan V; Hammond P Genitourin Med; 1986 Jun; 62(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 3525389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Chlamydia trachomatis. Direct detection with an immunofluorescence test]. Iveland H; Skaug K; Dahl M; Bergan T; Stray-Pedersen B; Anestad G; Gundersen T; Andersen GM Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1986 Aug; 106(22):1689-90, 1673. PubMed ID: 3535161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of direct immunofluorescence and cell culture for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis. Foulkes SJ; Deighton R; Feeney AR; Mohanty KC; Freeman CW Genitourin Med; 1985 Aug; 61(4):255-7. PubMed ID: 3894214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory tests for chlamydial infection. Their role in epidemiological studies of trachoma and its control. Jones BR Br J Ophthalmol; 1974 Apr; 58(4):438-54. PubMed ID: 4606714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Chlamydia diagnosis in clinical practice. Chlamydia trachomatis EIA and direct immunofluorescence (MikroTak) in comparison with cell culture]. Gelzer D; Cathomas G; Bienz K; Rohrbach M; Viollier E; Rufli T Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1988 Feb; 118(7):223-6. PubMed ID: 3282301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Direct diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis using monoclonal antibodies; diagnosis without culture?]. Verbrugh HA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1986 Mar; 130(10):462. PubMed ID: 3515205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Current methods in the diagnosis of Chlamydia infections]. Catalan F; Khoury B; Ouizman E; Mimic V; Doulé D; Margeray M Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Oct; 79(10):617-23. PubMed ID: 6396811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conventional tissue culture compared with rapid immunofluorescence for identifying Chlamydia trachomatis in specimens from patients attending a genitourinary clinic. Teare EL; Sexton C; Lim F; McManus T; Cuttley AH; Hodgson J Genitourin Med; 1985 Dec; 61(6):379-82. PubMed ID: 3910545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in routine clinical practice: increased sensitivity of cell culture in comparison with the microimmunofluorescence test]. Sterzik K; Rosenbusch B; Danner B; Heeg KM; Wolf A; Lauritzen C Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Dec; 48(12):881-3. PubMed ID: 3069566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnosis of ocular Chlamydia infections by direct detection]. Bialasiewicz AA; Radtke U; Jahn GJ Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Aug; 191(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 3312763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Culture versus direct specimen test: comparative study of infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in Viennese prostitutes. Stary A; Kopp W; Gebhart W; Söltz-Szöts J Genitourin Med; 1985 Aug; 61(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 3894215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Serological diagnosis with the Chlamydia Spot-IF test. Mannion PT; Mallinson H; Treharne JD J Med Microbiol; 1991 Oct; 35(4):244-8. PubMed ID: 1941995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Chlamydia trachomatis conjunctivitis in adults. Study of diagnostic techniques]. Adenis JP; Saint-Blancat P; Ranger S; Martin P; Duprat F; Barbarie S J Fr Ophtalmol; 1993; 16(3):178-83. PubMed ID: 8496568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis by culture and Macchiavella's staining technique]. Zampachová E Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1991 Dec; 40(6):270-2. PubMed ID: 1724208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simplification of procedures used to test urine samples for Chlamydia trachomatis. Thomas BJ; Gilchrist C; Hay PE; Taylor-Robinson D J Clin Pathol; 1991 May; 44(5):374-5. PubMed ID: 2045494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]