These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35253966)

  • 21. Inertial microfluidics for high-throughput cell analysis and detection: a review.
    Zhou Z; Chen Y; Zhu S; Liu L; Ni Z; Xiang N
    Analyst; 2021 Oct; 146(20):6064-6083. PubMed ID: 34490431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Determining Particle Size and Position in a Coplanar Electrode Setup Using Measured Opacity for Microfluidic Cytometry.
    de Bruijn DS; Jorissen KFA; Olthuis W; van den Berg A
    Biosensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34677309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Submicron-precision particle characterization in microfluidic impedance cytometry with double differential electrodes.
    Zhong J; Liang M; Ai Y
    Lab Chip; 2021 Aug; 21(15):2869-2880. PubMed ID: 34236057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Analytical electric field and sensitivity analysis for two microfluidic impedance cytometer designs.
    Sun T; Green NG; Gawad S; Morgan H
    IET Nanobiotechnol; 2007 Oct; 1(5):69-79. PubMed ID: 17764376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. High-throughput linear optical stretcher for mechanical characterization of blood cells.
    Roth KB; Neeves KB; Squier J; Marr DW
    Cytometry A; 2016 Apr; 89(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 26565892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inertial Microfluidic Cell Stretcher (iMCS): Fully Automated, High-Throughput, and Near Real-Time Cell Mechanotyping.
    Deng Y; Davis SP; Yang F; Paulsen KS; Kumar M; Sinnott DeVaux R; Wang X; Conklin DS; Oberai A; Herschkowitz JI; Chung AJ
    Small; 2017 Jul; 13(28):. PubMed ID: 28544415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Concepts, electrode configuration, characterization, and data analytics of electric and electrochemical microfluidic platforms: a review.
    Nguyen TH; Nguyen HA; Tran Thi YV; Hoang Tran D; Cao H; Chu Duc T; Bui TT; Do Quang L
    Analyst; 2023 May; 148(9):1912-1929. PubMed ID: 36928639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Integrated inertial-impedance cytometry for rapid label-free leukocyte isolation and profiling of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs).
    Petchakup C; Tay HM; Li KHH; Hou HW
    Lab Chip; 2019 May; 19(10):1736-1746. PubMed ID: 31020286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microfluidic deformability cytometry: A review.
    Chen Y; Guo K; Jiang L; Zhu S; Ni Z; Xiang N
    Talanta; 2023 Jan; 251():123815. PubMed ID: 35952505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Supervised machine learning in microfluidic impedance flow cytometry for improved particle size determination.
    de Bruijn DS; Ten Eikelder HRA; Papadimitriou VA; Olthuis W; van den Berg A
    Cytometry A; 2023 Mar; 103(3):221-226. PubMed ID: 36908134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A microfluidic cytometer for white blood cell analysis.
    Peng T; Su X; Cheng X; Wei Z; Su X; Li Q
    Cytometry A; 2021 Nov; 99(11):1107-1113. PubMed ID: 34369647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct and Label-Free Cell Status Monitoring of Spheroids and Microcarriers Using Microfluidic Impedance Cytometry.
    Gong L; Petchakup C; Shi P; Tan PL; Tan LP; Tay CY; Hou HW
    Small; 2021 May; 17(21):e2007500. PubMed ID: 33759381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inherent single-cell bioelectrical parameters of thousands of neutrophils, eosinophils and basophils derived from impedance flow cytometry.
    Wang M; Zhang J; Tan H; Chen D; Lei Y; Li Y; Wang J; Chen J
    Cytometry A; 2022 Aug; 101(8):639-647. PubMed ID: 35419939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping.
    Gossett DR; Tse HT; Lee SA; Ying Y; Lindgren AG; Yang OO; Rao J; Clark AT; Di Carlo D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 May; 109(20):7630-5. PubMed ID: 22547795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Deciphering impedance cytometry signals with neural networks.
    Caselli F; Reale R; De Ninno A; Spencer D; Morgan H; Bisegna P
    Lab Chip; 2022 May; 22(9):1714-1722. PubMed ID: 35353108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High-Efficiency Single-Cell Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy.
    Feng Y; Huang L; Zhao P; Liang F; Wang W
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2644():81-97. PubMed ID: 37142917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Single-Cell Stretching in Viscoelastic Fluids with Electronically Triggered Imaging for Cellular Mechanical Phenotyping.
    Liang M; Yang D; Zhou Y; Li P; Zhong J; Ai Y
    Anal Chem; 2021 Mar; 93(10):4567-4575. PubMed ID: 33661609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A neural network approach for real-time particle/cell characterization in microfluidic impedance cytometry.
    Honrado C; McGrath JS; Reale R; Bisegna P; Swami NS; Caselli F
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2020 Jun; 412(16):3835-3845. PubMed ID: 32189012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the compatibility of single-cell microcarriers (nanovials) with microfluidic impedance cytometry.
    Brandi C; De Ninno A; Ruggiero F; Limiti E; Abbruzzese F; Trombetta M; Rainer A; Bisegna P; Caselli F
    Lab Chip; 2024 May; 24(11):2883-2892. PubMed ID: 38717432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rapid and Accurate Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using Label-Free Electrical Impedance-Based Microfluidic Platform.
    Chen J; Zhong J; Chang Y; Zhou Y; Koo SH; Tan TY; Lei H; Ai Y
    Small; 2024 Feb; 20(6):e2303352. PubMed ID: 37794624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.