116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35254666)
1. Comparison of outcomes of different biopsy schedules among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: An analysis of the G.A.P.3 global consortium database.
Beckmann KR; Bangma CH; Helleman J; Bjartell A; Carroll PR; Morgan T; Nieboer D; Santaolalla A; Trock BJ; Valdagni R; Roobol MJ;
Prostate; 2022 May; 82(7):876-879. PubMed ID: 35254666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Personalised biopsy schedules based on risk of Gleason upgrading for patients with low-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance.
Tomer A; Nieboer D; Roobol MJ; Bjartell A; Steyerberg EW; Rizopoulos D;
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 32531869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers.
Bokhorst LP; Alberts AR; Rannikko A; Valdagni R; Pickles T; Kakehi Y; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2015 Nov; 68(5):814-21. PubMed ID: 26138043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of progression following a negative biopsy in prostate cancer active surveillance.
Beckmann K; Santaolalla A; Sugimoto M; Carroll P; Rubio J; Villers A; Bjartell A; Morgan T; Dasgupta P; Van Hemelrijck M; Elhage O;
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Jun; 26(2):403-409. PubMed ID: 36008540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Multivariable Approach Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Avoid a Protocol-based Prostate Biopsy in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer-Data from the International Multicenter Prospective PRIAS Study.
Luiting HB; Remmers S; Boevé ER; Valdagni R; Chiu PK; Semjonow A; Berge V; Tully KH; Rannikko AS; Staerman F; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Dec; 5(6):651-658. PubMed ID: 35437217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Negative first follow-up prostate biopsy on active surveillance is associated with decreased risk of upgrading, suspicion of progression and converting to active treatment.
Singh S; Sandhu P; Beckmann K; Santaolalla A; Dewan K; Clovis S; Rusere J; Zisengwe G; Challacombe B; Brown C; Cathcart P; Popert R; Dasgupta P; Van Hemelrijck M; Elhage O
BJU Int; 2021 Jul; 128(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 33098158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancer mortality and metastasis under different biopsy frequencies in North American active surveillance cohorts.
Lange JM; Laviana AA; Penson DF; Lin DW; Bill-Axelson A; Carlsson SV; Newcomb LF; Trock BJ; Carter HB; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Klotz LH; Etzioni RB
Cancer; 2020 Feb; 126(3):583-592. PubMed ID: 31639200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Follow-up in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Strict Protocol Adherence Remains Important for PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Biesma DH; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 2(5):483-489. PubMed ID: 31411970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer in a Real-life Cohort: Comparing Outcomes for PRIAS-eligible and PRIAS-ineligible Patients.
Soeterik TFW; van Melick HHE; Dijksman LM; Biesma DH; Witjes JA; van Basten JA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31102626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Indications for intervention during active surveillance of prostate cancer: a comparison of the Johns Hopkins and Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) protocols.
Kates M; Tosoian JJ; Trock BJ; Feng Z; Carter HB; Partin AW
BJU Int; 2015 Feb; 115(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 24904995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Analysis of Biopsy Upgrading in Four Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohorts.
Inoue LYT; Lin DW; Newcomb LF; Leonardson AS; Ankerst D; Gulati R; Carter HB; Trock BJ; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Klotz LH; Mamedov A; Penson DF; Etzioni R
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jan; 168(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29181514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation active surveillance prostate cancer cohort: a characterisation of a prostate cancer active surveillance database.
Shah S; Beckmann K; Van Hemelrijck M; Challacombe B; Popert R; Dasgupta P; Rusere J; Zisengwe G; Elhage O; Santaolalla A
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):573. PubMed ID: 34011308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Refined Analysis of Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics to Predict Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Outcomes.
Cooperberg MR; Brooks JD; Faino AV; Newcomb LF; Kearns JT; Carroll PR; Dash A; Etzioni R; Fabrizio MD; Gleave ME; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Lin DW; Zheng Y
Eur Urol; 2018 Aug; 74(2):211-217. PubMed ID: 29433975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of a 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score in Serial Testing of Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Cedars BE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Tenggara I; Chan JM; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 30958742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Personalized Decision Making for Biopsies in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Programs.
Tomer A; Rizopoulos D; Nieboer D; Drost FJ; Roobol MJ; Steyerberg EW
Med Decis Making; 2019 Jul; 39(5):499-508. PubMed ID: 31319751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Complications after prostate biopsies in men on active surveillance and its effects on receiving further biopsies in the Prostate cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) study.
Bokhorst LP; Lepistö I; Kakehi Y; Bangma CH; Pickles T; Valdagni R; Alberts AR; Semjonow A; Strölin P; Montesino MF; Berge V; Roobol MJ; Rannikko A
BJU Int; 2016 Sep; 118(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 26765682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regular transition zone biopsy during active surveillance for prostate cancer may improve detection of pathological progression.
Wong LM; Toi A; Van der Kwast T; Trottier G; Alibhai SM; Timilshina N; Evans A; Zlotta A; Fleshner N; Finelli A
J Urol; 2014 Oct; 192(4):1088-93. PubMed ID: 24742593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic Review of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer to Develop Recommendations Regarding Inclusion of Intermediate-risk Disease, Biopsy Characteristics at Inclusion and Monitoring, and Surveillance Repeat Biopsy Strategy.
Willemse PM; Davis NF; Grivas N; Zattoni F; Lardas M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; De Santis M; Dell'Oglio P; Donaldson JF; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Gillessen S; Grummet JP; Henry AM; Liew M; MacLennan S; Mason MD; Moris L; Plass K; O'Hanlon S; Omar MI; Oprea-Lager DE; Pang KH; Paterson CC; Ploussard G; Rouvière O; Schoots IG; Tilki D; van den Bergh RCN; Van den Broeck T; van der Kwast TH; van der Poel HG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TBL
Eur Urol; 2022 Apr; 81(4):337-346. PubMed ID: 34980492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Clinical Significance of Multiple Negative Surveillance Prostate Biopsies for Men on Active Surveillance-Does Cancer Vanish or Simply Hide?
Chu CE; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; de la Calle C; Shoemaker J; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 33198555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Active Surveillance Strategies for Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer.
Sathianathen NJ; Konety BR; Alarid-Escudero F; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM; Kuntz KM
Eur Urol; 2019 Jun; 75(6):910-917. PubMed ID: 30425010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
