BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35254730)

  • 1. The fluid handling performance of the curea P1 multipurpose dressing against superabsorbent and foam dressing technologies.
    Orlov A; Gefen A
    Int Wound J; 2022 May; 19(4):945-956. PubMed ID: 35254730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluid handling performance of wound dressings tested in a robotic venous leg ulcer system under compression therapy.
    Orlov A; Gefen A
    Int Wound J; 2023 May; 20(5):1384-1392. PubMed ID: 36267049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does exudate viscosity affect its rate of absorption into wound dressings?
    Forss JR
    J Wound Care; 2022 Mar; 31(3):236-242. PubMed ID: 35199601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A robotic venous leg ulcer system reveals the benefits of negative pressure wound therapy in effective fluid handling.
    Orlov A; Ciliberti M; Somma R; Gefen A
    Int Wound J; 2023 Oct; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 37786996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Not all superabsorbent wound dressings are born equal: theory and experiments.
    Gefen A
    J Wound Care; 2021 Sep; 30(9):738-750. PubMed ID: 34554841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fluid Handling Dynamics and Durability of Silver-Containing Gelling Fiber Dressings Tested in a Robotic Wound System.
    Orlov A; Lustig A; Grigatti A; Gefen A
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2022 Jun; 35(6):326-334. PubMed ID: 35293376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fluid handling by foam wound dressings: From engineering theory to advanced laboratory performance evaluations.
    Gefen A; Alves P; Beeckman D; Cullen B; Lázaro-Martínez JL; Lev-Tov H; Santamaria N; Swanson T; Woo K; Söderström B; Svensby A; Malone M; Nygren E
    Int Wound J; 2024 Feb; 21(2):e14674. PubMed ID: 38353372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectively managing wound exudate.
    Chamanga E
    Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Sep; Suppl Wound Care():S8, S10. PubMed ID: 26322408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of the simulated wound fluid composition and properties in the determination of the fluid handling performance of wound dressings.
    Svensby AU; Nygren E; Gefen A; Cullen B; Ronkvist ÅM; Gergely A; Craig MD
    Int Wound J; 2024 May; 21(5):e14861. PubMed ID: 38738669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional shape-conformation performances of wound dressings tested in a robotic sacral pressure ulcer phantom.
    Lustig A; Gefen A
    Int Wound J; 2021 Oct; 18(5):670-680. PubMed ID: 33605541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the in vitro moisture vapour transmission rate and in vivo fluid-handling capacity of six adhesive foam dressings to a newly reformulated adhesive foam dressing.
    Zehrer CL; Holm D; Solfest SE; Walters SA
    Int Wound J; 2014 Dec; 11(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 23362795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical performance characteristics for bordered foam dressings in the treatment of complex wounds: An international wound dressing technology expert panel review.
    Santamaria N; Woo K; Beeckman D; Alves P; Cullen B; Gefen A; Lázaro-Martínez JL; Lev-Tov H; Najafi B; Sharpe A; Swanson T
    Int Wound J; 2023 Nov; 20(9):3467-3473. PubMed ID: 37139846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The performance of gelling fibre wound dressings under clinically relevant robotic laboratory tests.
    Lustig A; Gefen A
    Int Wound J; 2022 Sep; 19 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):3-21. PubMed ID: 35142062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a superabsorbent dressing and antimicrobial for a venous ulcer.
    Hampton S; Coulborn A; Tadej M; Bree-Aslan C
    Br J Nurs; 2011 Aug 11-Sep 8; 20(15):S38, S40-3. PubMed ID: 21841650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exudate-handling mechanisms of two foam-film dressings.
    Thomas S; Young S
    J Wound Care; 2008 Jul; 17(7):309-15. PubMed ID: 18705233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of the functional properties of superabsorbent dressings and their effect on exudate management.
    Browning P; White RJ; Rowell T
    J Wound Care; 2016 Aug; 25(8):452-62. PubMed ID: 27523657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fluid management and strength postsimulated use of primary and secondary dressings for treating diabetic foot ulcers: Robotic phantom studies.
    Lustig A; Gefen A
    Int Wound J; 2022 Feb; 19(2):305-315. PubMed ID: 34132486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An observational study of a superabsorbent polymer dressing evaluated by clinicians and patients.
    Barrett S; Callaghan R; Chadwick P; Haycocks S; Rippon M; Stephen-Haynes J; Simm S
    J Wound Care; 2018 Feb; 27(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 29424643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical case-series evaluation of a superabsorbent dressing on exuding wounds.
    Hindhede A; Meuleneire F
    J Wound Care; 2012 Nov; 21(11):574, 576-80. PubMed ID: 23413497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Handling properties of a superabsorbent dressing in the management of patients with moderate-to-very high exuding wounds.
    Münter KC; De Lange S; Eberlein T; Andriessen A; Abel M
    J Wound Care; 2018 Apr; 27(4):246-253. PubMed ID: 29637822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.