These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35255802)

  • 1. The long-term effects of genomic selection: 1. Response to selection, additive genetic variance, and genetic architecture.
    Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Calus MPL; Zwaan BJ; Vitezica ZG; van den Heuvel J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Mar; 54(1):19. PubMed ID: 35255802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The long-term effects of genomic selection: 2. Changes in allele frequencies of causal loci and new mutations.
    Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; van den Heuvel J; Zwaan BJ; Vitezica ZG; Calus MPL
    Genetics; 2023 Aug; 225(1):. PubMed ID: 37506255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
    Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrating Nonadditive Genomic Relationship Matrices into the Study of Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.
    Nazarian A; Gezan SA
    J Hered; 2016 Mar; 107(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 26712858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures.
    Bastiaansen JW; Coster A; Calus MP; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jan; 44(1):3. PubMed ID: 22273519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strategies and considerations for implementing genomic selection to improve traits with additive and non-additive genetic architectures in sugarcane breeding.
    Voss-Fels KP; Wei X; Ross EM; Frisch M; Aitken KS; Cooper M; Hayes BJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2021 May; 134(5):1493-1511. PubMed ID: 33587151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic analysis of dominance effects on milk production and conformation traits in Fleckvieh cattle.
    Ertl J; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Edel C; Emmerling R; Götz KU
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):40. PubMed ID: 24962065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs.
    Liu H; Sørensen AC; Meuwissen TH; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):8. PubMed ID: 24495634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic dissection of maternal, additive and non-additive genetic effects for growth and carcass traits in Nile tilapia.
    Joshi R; Meuwissen THE; Woolliams JA; Gjøen HM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jan; 52(1):1. PubMed ID: 31941436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic heritability estimates in sweet cherry reveal non-additive genetic variance is relevant for industry-prioritized traits.
    Piaskowski J; Hardner C; Cai L; Zhao Y; Iezzoni A; Peace C
    BMC Genet; 2018 Apr; 19(1):23. PubMed ID: 29636022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response to Selection in Finite Locus Models with Nonadditive Effects.
    Esfandyari H; Henryon M; Berg P; Thomasen JR; Bijma P; Sørensen AC
    J Hered; 2017 May; 108(3):318-327. PubMed ID: 28082328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of epistasis on response to genomic selection using complete sequence data.
    Forneris NS; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A; Pérez-Enciso M
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):66. PubMed ID: 28841821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of additive and non-additive genetic effects for fertility and reproduction traits in North American Holstein cattle using genomic information.
    Alves K; Brito LF; Baes CF; Sargolzaei M; Robinson JAB; Schenkel FS
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 May; 137(3):316-330. PubMed ID: 31912573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods for genomic selection of traits with additive and epistatic genetic architectures.
    Howard R; Carriquiry AL; Beavis WD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Apr; 4(6):1027-46. PubMed ID: 24727289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genetics; 2018 Jul; 209(3):711-723. PubMed ID: 29743175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action.
    Zeng J; Toosi A; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):11. PubMed ID: 23621868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens.
    Wolc A; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Preisinger R; Habier D; Fernando R; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Jun; 43(1):23. PubMed ID: 21693035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data.
    Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JW; Janss L; Knol EF; Bovenhuis H
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2629-37. PubMed ID: 26438289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic relationships reveal significant dominance effects for growth in hybrid Eucalyptus.
    Tan B; Grattapaglia D; Wu HX; Ingvarsson PK
    Plant Sci; 2018 Feb; 267():84-93. PubMed ID: 29362102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.