These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35256182)
1. Trueness and precision of skin surface reproduction in digital workflows for facial prosthesis fabrication. Unkovskiy A; Spintzyk S; Kiemle T; Roehler A; Huettig F J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):402-413. PubMed ID: 35256182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simplifying the digital workflow of facial prostheses manufacturing using a three-dimensional (3D) database: setup, development, and aspects of virtual data validation for reproduction. Unkovskiy A; Roehler A; Huettig F; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Brom J; Keutel C; Spintzyk S J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jul; 63(3):313-320. PubMed ID: 30792148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques. Kim SY; Shin YS; Jung HD; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Cha JY Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):144-153. PubMed ID: 29287640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology. Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology. Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis. Emir F; Ayyildiz S J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of trueness and precision of stereolithography-fabricated photopolymer-resin dentures under different postpolymerization conditions: An in vitro study. Katheng A; Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Hada T; Minakuchi S J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):514-520. PubMed ID: 33583615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies. Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used. Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36690552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Precision and trueness of maxillary crowded models produced by 2 vat photopolymerization 3-dimensional printing techniques. Rey-Joly Maura C; Godinho J; Amorim M; Pinto R; Marques D; Jardim L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jul; 160(1):124-131. PubMed ID: 34172172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clear guidance to select the most accurate technologies for 3D printing dental models - A network meta-analysis Németh A; Vitai V; Czumbel ML; Szabó B; Varga G; Kerémi B; Hegyi P; Hermann P; Borbély J J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104532. PubMed ID: 37120090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 3-dimensional printing technologies on the precision, trueness, and accuracy of printed retainers. Naeem OA; Bencharit S; Yang IH; Stilianoudakis SC; Carrico C; Tüfekçi E Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Apr; 161(4):582-591. PubMed ID: 35337648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts. Park JM; Jeon J; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):427-437. PubMed ID: 32958301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of 3D printed scan bodies for dental implants using two additive manufacturing systems: An in vitro study. Hopfensperger LJ; Talmazov G; Ammoun R; Brenes C; Bencharit S PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0283305. PubMed ID: 37027404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies. Dietrich CA; Ender A; Baumgartner S; Mehl A Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 28459285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of intaglio surface trueness of cement-retained implant-supported prostheses generated by a cast-free digital workflow and a three-dimensionally printed cast workflow. Hwang JY; Yoon HI J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):272.e1-272.e7. PubMed ID: 36180262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementation of 3D technologies in the workflow of auricular prosthetics: A method using optical scanning and stereolithography 3D printing. Bannink T; Bouman S; Wolterink R; van Veen R; van Alphen M J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 32611482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy, reproducibility, and dimensional stability of additively manufactured surgical templates. Chen L; Lin WS; Polido WD; Eckert GJ; Morton D J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 30948293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of maximum support attachment angle on intaglio surface trueness of anatomic contour monolithic prostheses manufactured by digital light processing and zirconia suspension. Cho JH; Yoon HI; Oh JH; Kim DH J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):478-485. PubMed ID: 36621357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of Dental Replica Models Using Photopolymer Materials in Additive Manufacturing: In Vitro Three-Dimensional Evaluation. Jin SJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim WC J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e557-e562. PubMed ID: 29968424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]