These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35256182)

  • 41. Do hydrothermal aging and microwave sterilization affect the trueness of milled, additive manufactured and injection molded denture bases?
    Wemken G; Spies BC; Pieralli S; Adali U; Beuer F; Wesemann C
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov; 111():103975. PubMed ID: 32781402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Accuracy of trial restorations from virtual planning: A comparison of two fabrication techniques.
    Ortensi L; Lo Castro E; Rapisarda E; Pedullà E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):425-429. PubMed ID: 33317829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition.
    Grassia V; Ronsivalle V; Isola G; Nucci L; Leonardi R; Lo Giudice A
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):352. PubMed ID: 37268910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. In vitro accuracies of 3D printed models manufactured by two different printing technologies.
    Emir F; Ceylan G; Ayyildiz S
    Eur Oral Res; 2021 May; 55(2):80-85. PubMed ID: 34250474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Automated Noncontact Facial Topography Mapping, 3-Dimensional Printing, and Silicone Casting of Orbital Prosthesis.
    Weisson EH; Fittipaldi M; Concepcion CA; Pelaez D; Grace L; Tse DT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 220():27-36. PubMed ID: 32707202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows.
    Sim JY; Jang Y; Kim WC; Kim HY; Lee DH; Kim JH
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 29615324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide.
    Kim T; Lee S; Kim GB; Hong D; Kwon J; Park JW; Kim N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):195-201.e2. PubMed ID: 31753464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of the trueness and adaptation of zirconia crowns fabricated with stereolithography.
    Li B; Jiang Q; Meng D
    Dent Mater J; 2023 May; 42(3):441-448. PubMed ID: 37032106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.
    Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Effect of Build Angle and Artificial Aging on the Accuracy of SLA- and DLP-Printed Occlusal Devices.
    Saadat Sarmadi B; Schmidt F; Beuer F; Metin DS; Simeon P; Nicic R; Unkovskiy A
    Polymers (Basel); 2024 Jun; 16(12):. PubMed ID: 38932064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of Intaglio Surface Trueness of Interim Dental Crowns Fabricated with SLA 3D Printing, DLP 3D Printing, and Milling Technologies.
    Son K; Lee JH; Lee KB
    Healthcare (Basel); 2021 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 34442120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Trueness of Obturator Prosthesis Base Manufactured by Conventional and 3D Printing Techniques.
    Alfaraj A; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 34048118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Trueness and fitting accuracy of maxillary 3D printed complete dentures.
    Yoshidome K; Torii M; Kawamura N; Shimpo H; Ohkubo C
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Oct; 65(4):559-564. PubMed ID: 33980786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Manufacturing accuracy of the intaglio surface of definitive resin-ceramic crowns fabricated at different print orientations by using a stereolithography printer.
    Revilla-León M; Fry E; Supaphakorn A; Barmak AB; Kois JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37246096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
    Yoon HI; Hwang HJ; Ohkubo C; Han JS; Park EJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):919-926. PubMed ID: 29961610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Flexural Strength of 3D-Printing Resin Materials for Provisional Fixed Dental Prostheses.
    Park SM; Park JM; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY
    Materials (Basel); 2020 Sep; 13(18):. PubMed ID: 32911702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Quantitative evaluation of printing accuracy of multi-color and multi-hardness three-dimensional printing dental model with photopolymer jetting].
    Shen YR; Chen H; Ma KN; Sun YC
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 56(7):652-658. PubMed ID: 34275220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
    Hwang HJ; Lee SJ; Park EJ; Yoon HI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 30006217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Trueness of stereolithography ZrO
    Lee HB; Bea EJ; Lee WS; Kim JH
    Dent Mater J; 2023 Jan; 42(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 36288942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Fabrication routes via projection stereolithography for 3D-printing of microfluidic geometries for nucleic acid amplification.
    Tzivelekis C; Sgardelis P; Waldron K; Whalley R; Huo D; Dalgarno K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240237. PubMed ID: 33112867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.