These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35258361)
1. The Interval Anchoring Effect. Liu M; Zeng J; Gao Z Exp Psychol; 2021 Nov; 68(6):295-304. PubMed ID: 35258361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An Experimental Study on Anchoring Effect of Consumers' Price Judgment Based on Consumers' Experiencing Scenes. Zong Y; Guo X Front Psychol; 2022; 13():794135. PubMed ID: 35211062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anchors as Semantic Primes in Value Construction: An EEG Study of the Anchoring Effect. Ma Q; Li D; Shen Q; Qiu W PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139954. PubMed ID: 26439926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age similarities in the anchoring effect in emotion intensity judgment. Jin M; Peng H; Wang D BMC Psychol; 2023 May; 11(1):158. PubMed ID: 37189205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motivated Use of Numerical Anchors for Judgments Relevant to the Self. Joel S; Spielmann SS; MacDonald G Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jul; 43(7):972-985. PubMed ID: 28903703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents. Wilson TD; Houston CE; Etling KM; Brekke N J Exp Psychol Gen; 1996 Dec; 125(4):387-402. PubMed ID: 8945789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of accuracy motivation on anchoring and adjustment: do people adjust from provided anchors? Simmons JP; LeBoeuf RA; Nelson LD J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Dec; 99(6):917-32. PubMed ID: 21114351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anchoring effect in legal decision-making: A meta-analysis. Bystranowski P; Janik B; Próchnicki M; Skórska P Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 33734746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of irrelevant anchors on the judgments and choices of doctors and patients. Brewer NT; Chapman GB; Schwartz JA; Bergus GR Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 17409369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Not all Anchors Weigh Equally. Greenstein M; Velazquez A Exp Psychol; 2017 Nov; 64(6):398-405. PubMed ID: 29268677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values. Chapman GB; Johnson EJ Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Aug; 79(2):115-153. PubMed ID: 10433900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is 7300 m Equal to 7.3 km? Same Semantics but Different Anchoring Effects. Wong KF; Kwong JY Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Jul; 82(2):314-333. PubMed ID: 10891300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anchoring in Numeric Judgments of Visual Stimuli. Langeborg L; Eriksson M Front Psychol; 2016; 7():225. PubMed ID: 26941684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrophysiological correlates of adjustment process in anchoring effects. Qu C; Zhou L; Luo YJ Neurosci Lett; 2008 Nov; 445(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 18675315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring. Yang C; Sun B; Shanks DR Mem Cognit; 2018 Apr; 46(3):384-397. PubMed ID: 29164524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anchors aweigh: a demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming. Oppenheimer DM; LeBoeuf RA; Brewer NT Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 17286970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anchoring effects in the judgment of confidence: semantic or numeric priming? Carroll SR; Petrusic WM; Leth-Steensen C Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19304619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The nature of anchor-biased estimates and its application to the wisdom of crowds. Honda H; Kagawa R; Shirasuna M Cognition; 2024 May; 246():105758. PubMed ID: 38442587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]