These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3525842)
1. Increased detection of polymicrobial septicaemia by repeat subculture. Spencer RC; Nicol CD J Med Microbiol; 1986 Aug; 22(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 3525842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeat subculture of known positive blood cultures: costly and ineffective in detecting polymicrobial bacteremias. Stetz EM; Martin WJ Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1985 Mar; 3(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 3884244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal time for routine early subculture of blood cultures. Sliva HS; Washington JA J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Sep; 12(3):445-6. PubMed ID: 7012178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a routine anaerobic subculture of blood cultures for detection of anaerobic bacteremia. Paisley JW; Rosenblatt JE; Hall M; Washington JA J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Dec; 8(6):764-6. PubMed ID: 370151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the efficacy of reincubation and subsequent subculture of initially positive blood cultures in the detection of additional clinically significant isolates. Towne AR; Gay RM J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Feb; 21(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 3882743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid detection of bacteraemia by early subculture. Ganguli LA; O'Hare W; Hyde WA J Med Microbiol; 1984 Jun; 17(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 6202872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of bacteremia in leukemic patients by early subcultures with a slide blood culture system. Richet H; Gerbal R; Hautefort B; Chataigne R; Lagrange PH Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 Mar; 33(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 3892449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid detection of bacteremia by an early subculture technic. Todd JK; Roe MH Am J Clin Pathol; 1975 Nov; 64(5):694-9. PubMed ID: 1103613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the necessity for routine terminal subcultures of previously negative blood cultures. Campbell J; Washington JA J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Oct; 12(4):576-8. PubMed ID: 6999023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bacterial isolates in blood cultures of children with suspected septicaemia in Kano: a two-year study. Nwadioha SI; Kashibu E; Alao OO; Aliyu I Niger Postgrad Med J; 2011 Jun; 18(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 21670781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of two methods of processing blood cultures in a community hospital. Magnussen CR Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Jun; 77(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 7046419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical value of endotoxin determination in infection. Comparison of the Limulus amebocyte lysate test with detection of bacterial pathogens]. Watzke H; Schwarz HP; Luger A; Stummvoll HK Acta Med Austriaca; 1987; 14(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 3303795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical significance of potential contaminants in blood cultures among patients in a medical center. Lee CC; Lin WJ; Shih HI; Wu CJ; Chen PL; Lee HC; Lee NY; Chang CM; Wang LR; Ko WC J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2007 Oct; 40(5):438-44. PubMed ID: 17932605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incubation time required for neonatal blood cultures to become positive. Jardine L; Davies MW; Faoagali J J Paediatr Child Health; 2006 Dec; 42(12):797-802. PubMed ID: 17096716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Early bacterial genome detection in body fluids from patients with severe sepsis: a pilot study. Dugard A; Chainier D; Barraud O; Garnier F; Ploy MC; Vignon P; François B J Crit Care; 2012 Aug; 27(4):416.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22227083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The laboratory approach to the detection of bacteremia. Tilton RC Annu Rev Microbiol; 1982; 36():467-93. PubMed ID: 6184012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]