These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35259504)

  • 1. Meeting Patient Expectations and Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability, Back Pain, and Leg Pain May Provide Predictive Utility for Achieving Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Decompression Patients.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Park GJ; Vanjani NN; Prabhu MC; Pawlowski H; Parsons AW; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e328-e335. PubMed ID: 35259504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Achievement of a Minimum Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability Is a Suitable Predictor of Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Fusion Patients.
    Geoghegan CE; Mohan S; Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Jadczak CN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e94-e100. PubMed ID: 34023465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Leg Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement, and Patient Satisfaction After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Parsons AW; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e1196-e1207. PubMed ID: 36075356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Ribot MA; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():e334-e346. PubMed ID: 34942388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Park GA; Gheewala JR; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Feb; 36(1):E6-E13. PubMed ID: 35759781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Self-Identified Gender on Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Decompression: Cohort-Matched Analysis.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Park GJ; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Apr; 160():e616-e627. PubMed ID: 35108646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meeting Patient Expectations or Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference: Predictors of Satisfaction among Lumbar Fusion Patients.
    Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Jadczak CN; Mohan S; Geoghegan CE; Singh K
    Asian Spine J; 2022 Aug; 16(4):478-485. PubMed ID: 34465014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement in predominant back pain following minimally invasive decompression for spinal stenosis.
    Korsun MK; Shahi P; Shinn DJ; Pajak A; Araghi K; Maayan O; Singh N; Tuma O; Asada T; Singh S; Kim AYE; Mai E; Lu AZ; Sheha E; Dowdell J; Qureshi S; Iyer S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Oct; 39(4):576-582. PubMed ID: 37486867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time to achievement of minimum clinically important difference after lumbar decompression.
    Nie JW; Federico VP; Hartman TJ; Zheng E; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Massel DH; Sayari AJ; Singh K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Sep; 165(9):2625-2631. PubMed ID: 37488399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Presenting Mental Health Influences Postoperative Clinical Trajectory and Long-Term Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Decompression.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e649-e661. PubMed ID: 35577207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of American Society of Anesthesiologists' Classification on Postoperative Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression: Cohort-Matched Analysis.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Mar; 37(2):E89-E96. PubMed ID: 37941112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative Predictors in Patients Undergoing Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Zheng E; Federico VP; Massel DH; Sayari AJ; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Jul; 175():e914-e924. PubMed ID: 37080454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of minimally invasive decompression alone versus minimally invasive short-segment fusion in the setting of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Echt M; Bakare AA; Varela JR; Platt A; Abdul Sami M; Molenda J; Kerolus M; Fessler RG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Sep; 39(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 37327145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association between muscle health and patient-reported outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy: early results.
    Song J; Araghi K; Dupont MM; Shahi P; Bovonratwet P; Shinn D; Dalal SS; Melissaridou D; Virk SS; Iyer S; Dowdell JE; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1677-1686. PubMed ID: 35671940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiographic predictors of reaching minimal clinically important difference following lumbar fusion surgery in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Wang D; Chen X; Han D; Wang W; Kong C; Lu S
    Eur Spine J; 2024 May; 33(5):1786-1795. PubMed ID: 38093000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Back Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Recovery Ratios, and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF).
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e254-e265. PubMed ID: 34583000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis.
    Hijji FY; Narain AS; Bohl DD; Yom KH; Kudaravalli KT; Lopez GD; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Feb; 31(1):E92-E97. PubMed ID: 28538082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.