These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35259971)

  • 1. Citation bias: questionable research practice or scientific misconduct?
    Duyx B; Urlings M; Swaen G; Bouter L; Zeegers M
    J R Soc Med; 2022 Apr; 115(4):124. PubMed ID: 35259971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Citation bias: questionable research practice or scientific misconduct?
    Gøtzsche PC
    J R Soc Med; 2022 Jan; 115(1):31-35. PubMed ID: 35105192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists.
    Tijdink JK; Verbeke R; Smulders YM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):64-71. PubMed ID: 25747691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defining and Handling Research Misconduct: A Comparison Between Chinese and European Institutional Policies.
    Li D; Cornelis G
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):302-319. PubMed ID: 32613889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
    Resnik DB
    Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A case of scientific misconduct.
    O'Malley P
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(5):265-7. PubMed ID: 19710573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A case of scientific misconduct: the cost of bad science.
    Broome ME
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(5):268. PubMed ID: 19710574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers.
    Kaiser M; Drivdal L; Hjellbrekke J; Ingierd H; Rekdal OB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Dec; 28(1):2. PubMed ID: 34932191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Scientific misconduct: A major threat for medical research].
    Barde F; Peiffer-Smadja N; de La Blanchardière A
    Rev Med Interne; 2020 May; 41(5):330-334. PubMed ID: 32107052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical Shades of Gray: International Frequency of Scientific Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices in Health Professions Education.
    Artino AR; Driessen EW; Maggio LA
    Acad Med; 2019 Jan; 94(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 30113363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The unfortunately long life of some retracted biomedical research publications.
    Hagberg JM
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2020 May; 128(5):1381-1391. PubMed ID: 32240014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fraud and misconduct in scientific research: a definition and procedures for investigation.
    Catano VM; Turk J
    Med Law; 2007 Sep; 26(3):465-76. PubMed ID: 17970246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Researchers' interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study.
    Shaw D; Satalkar P
    Account Res; 2018; 25(2):79-93. PubMed ID: 29291621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific misconduct. How prevalent is fraud? That's a million-dollar question.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5497):1662-3. PubMed ID: 11186377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem?
    Berg AO
    Fam Med; 1990; 22(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 2182360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differing perceptions concerning research misconduct between China and Flanders: A qualitative study.
    Li D; Cornelis G
    Account Res; 2021 Feb; 28(2):63-94. PubMed ID: 32718198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals.
    Bosch X; Hernández C; Pericas JM; Doti P; Marušić A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51928. PubMed ID: 23284820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cycles of invisibility: The limits of transparency in dealing with scientific misconduct.
    Hesselmann F; Reinhart M
    Soc Stud Sci; 2021 Jun; 51(3):414-438. PubMed ID: 33234058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research misconduct: Dr Grethe Stoa Birketvedt not guilty of scientific misconduct.
    Florholmen J; Leeds AR
    J R Soc Med; 2010 Jun; 103(6):214. PubMed ID: 20513898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Criminalization of scientific misconduct.
    Bülow W; Helgesson G
    Med Health Care Philos; 2019 Jun; 22(2):245-252. PubMed ID: 30155851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.