BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35260369)

  • 1. The association between perineural invasion in mpMRI-targeted and/or systematic prostate biopsy and adverse pathological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Karsiyakali N; Bulent Ozgen M; Ozveren B; Akbal C; Dincer A; Durak H; Turkeri L
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022; 46(6):377-384. PubMed ID: 35260369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy combined with standard template improves perineural invasion detection.
    Wu CL; Kim M; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Dahl DM
    Hum Pathol; 2021 Nov; 117():101-107. PubMed ID: 34461132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perineural invasion on prostate biopsy does not predict adverse pathological outcome.
    Elharram M; Margel D; Finelli A; Trachtenberg J; Evans A; van der Kwast TH; Sweet JM; Fleshner N
    Can J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):6567-72. PubMed ID: 23228294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suboptimal Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens by mpMRI-Targeted Biopsy.
    Karsiyakali N; Ozgen MB; Ozveren B; Akbal C; Dincer A; Durak H; Turkeri L
    Urology; 2021 Feb; 148():217-223. PubMed ID: 32871139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men: direct comparison of systematic biopsy, multiparametric MRI- and contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging-targeted biopsy.
    Mannaerts CK; Engelbrecht MRW; Postema AW; van Kollenburg RAA; Hoeks CMA; Savci-Heijink CD; Van Sloun RJG; Wildeboer RR; De Reijke TM; Mischi M; Wijkstra H
    BJU Int; 2020 Oct; 126(4):481-493. PubMed ID: 32315112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Targeted Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Quantitative Gleason 4 Grading Prediction in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance Candidate Selection.
    Kachanov M; Budäus L; Beyersdorff D; Karakiewicz PI; Tian Z; Falkenbach F; Tilki D; Maurer T; Sauter G; Graefen M; Leyh-Bannurah SR
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Mar; 9(2):303-308. PubMed ID: 36184537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer based on needle biopsy findings: perineural invasion lacks significance on multivariate analysis.
    Egan AJ; Bostwick DG
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1997 Dec; 21(12):1496-500. PubMed ID: 9414194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of mpMRI-targeted vs systematic biopsy on the risk of prostate cancer downgrading at final pathology.
    Sorce G; Stabile A; Pellegrino F; Mazzone E; Mattei A; Afferi L; Serni S; Minervini A; Roumiguiè M; Malavaud B; Valerio M; Rakauskas A; Marra G; Gontero P; Porpiglia F; Guo H; Zhuang J; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    World J Urol; 2024 Apr; 42(1):248. PubMed ID: 38647689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combined systematic versus stand-alone multiparametric MRI-guided targeted fusion biopsy: nomogram prediction of non-organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Karakiewicz PI; Beyersdorff D; Pompe RS; Oh-Hohenhorst SJ; Fisch M; Maurer T; Graefen M; Budäus L
    World J Urol; 2021 Jan; 39(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 32248363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
    Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Improves Agreement Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score.
    Porpiglia F; DE Luca S; Passera R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Bollito E; DE Pascale A; Cossu M; Aimar R; Veltri A
    Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4833-9. PubMed ID: 27630337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of TRUS and combined MRI-targeted plus systematic prostate biopsy for the concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.
    Aslan G; Çelik S; Sözen S; Akdoğan B; İzol V; Yücel Bilen C; Sahin B; Türkeri L;
    Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Mar; 75(3):e13797. PubMed ID: 33113261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy.
    Kachanov M; Budäus L; Witt JH; Wagner C; Zinke J; Fangmeyer B; Schütte A; Spieker T; Beyersdorff D; Graefen M; Rachubinski P; Leyh-Bannurah SR
    World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):2955-2961. PubMed ID: 36357604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy specimen and survival after radical prostatectomy.
    DeLancey JO; Wood DP; He C; Montgomery JS; Weizer AZ; Miller DC; Jacobs BL; Montie JE; Hollenbeck BK; Skolarus TA
    Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):354-7. PubMed ID: 23374801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches.
    Wu S; Feldman AS; Kim MM; Lin SX; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Dahl DM; Wu CL
    Urology; 2023 May; 175():151-156. PubMed ID: 36828261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
    Yusim I; Mazor E; Frumkin E; Jabareen M; Hefer B; Elsaraya N; Li S; Rouvinov K; Novack V; Mabjeesh NJ
    Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 37263774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates.
    Dahl DM; Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Feldman AS; Wu CL
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):451.e9-451.e14. PubMed ID: 36008257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
    Dell'Atti L
    J BUON; 2016; 21(5):1219-1223. PubMed ID: 27837626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting surgical margin positivity in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Yuksel M; Karamık K; Anıl H; Islamoglu E; Ates M; Savas M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Mar; 89(1):71-74. PubMed ID: 28403595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Goel S; Shoag JE; Gross MD; Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Robinson B; Khani F; Baltich Nelson B; Margolis DJ; Hu JC
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 31492650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.