BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35261284)

  • 61. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Relationship Between Procedural Volume and Outcomes.
    Badheka AO; Panaich SS; Arora S; Patel N; Patel NJ; Savani C; Deshmukh A; Cohen MG
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2016 Apr; 18(4):39. PubMed ID: 26960424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry: development of a nomogram predictive of in-hospital mortality.
    Klein LW; Block P; Brindis RG; McKay CR; McCallister BD; Wolk M; Weintraub W;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Aug; 40(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 12142102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Factors associated with poorer prognosis for patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention during off-hours: biology or systems failure?
    Glaser R; Naidu SS; Selzer F; Jacobs AK; Laskey WK; Srinivas VS; Slater JN; Wilensky RL
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Dec; 1(6):681-8. PubMed ID: 19463384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Procedural Volume and Outcomes After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Kerala, India: Report of the Cardiological Society of India-Kerala Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry.
    Jabir A; Mathew A; Zheng Y; Westerhout C; Viswanathan S; Sebastian P; Kumar P; Bangalore S; Bainey KR; Welsh R
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Jun; 9(12):e014968. PubMed ID: 32476563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [In-hospital Outcomes and Complications of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Different Age Groups].
    Kochergina AM; Kashtalap VV; Kochergin NA; Ganyukov VI; Barbarash OL
    Kardiologiia; 2016 Sep; 56(9):21-26. PubMed ID: 28290860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The impact of previous revascularization on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Bench TJ; Parikh PB; Jeremias A; Brener SJ; Naidu SS; Shlofmitz RA; Pappas T; Marzo KP; Gruberg L
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 25(4):166-9. PubMed ID: 23549488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. In-Hospital Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome With Cardiogenic Shock (from a Japanese Nationwide Registry [J-PCI Registry]).
    Kubo S; Yamaji K; Inohara T; Kohsaka S; Tanaka H; Ishii H; Uemura S; Amano T; Nakamura M; Kadota K
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 May; 123(10):1595-1601. PubMed ID: 30846213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral coronary intervention in octogenarians with acute myocardial infarction.
    Lee HW; Cha KS; Ahn J; Choi JC; Oh JH; Choi JH; Lee HC; Yun E; Jang HY; Choi JH; Hong TJ; Jeong MH; Ahn Y; Chae SC; Kim YJ;
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 202():419-24. PubMed ID: 26433163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Determinants and Outcomes of Stroke Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention by Indication.
    Myint PK; Kwok CS; Roffe C; Kontopantelis E; Zaman A; Berry C; Ludman PF; de Belder MA; Mamas MA;
    Stroke; 2016 Jun; 47(6):1500-7. PubMed ID: 27165953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Association of public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention with utilization and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction.
    Joynt KE; Blumenthal DM; Orav EJ; Resnic FS; Jha AK
    JAMA; 2012 Oct; 308(14):1460-8. PubMed ID: 23047360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transferred from community hospitals.
    Coleman CI; McKay RG; Boden WE; Mather JF; White CM
    Clin Ther; 2006 Jul; 28(7):1054-62. PubMed ID: 16990084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Outcomes and Temporal Trends of Inpatient Percutaneous Coronary Intervention at Centers With and Without On-site Cardiac Surgery in the United States.
    Goel K; Gupta T; Kolte D; Khera S; Fonarow GC; Bhatt DL; Singh M; Rihal CS
    JAMA Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 2(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 27893054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Protective Effects of Salvianolate on Myocardial Injury or Myocardial Infarction after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in NSTE-ACS Patients: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.
    Ou Y; Sun SJ; Shi HM; Luo JF; Luo XP; Shen YZ; Chen YF; Fan WH; Liu HY; Shen W
    Chin J Integr Med; 2020 Sep; 26(9):656-662. PubMed ID: 32572777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Smilowitz NR; Alviar CL; Katz SD; Hochman JS
    Am Heart J; 2020 Aug; 226():255-263. PubMed ID: 32278440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Multivessel vs culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention among patients 65 years or older with acute myocardial infarction.
    Wang TY; McCoy LA; Bhatt DL; Rao SV; Roe MT; Resnic FS; Cavender MA; Messenger JC; Peterson ED
    Am Heart J; 2016 Feb; 172():9-18. PubMed ID: 26856210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Risks of noncardiac surgery early after percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Smilowitz NR; Lorin J; Berger JS
    Am Heart J; 2019 Nov; 217():64-71. PubMed ID: 31514076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Association of periprocedural intravenous morphine use on clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Batchelor R; Liu DH; Bloom J; Noaman S; Chan W
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 31654491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Relationship between time to treatment and mortality among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention according to Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.
    Kim HK; Jeong MH; Ahn Y; Chae SC; Kim YJ; Hur SH; Seong IW; Hong TJ; Choi DH; Cho MC; Kim CJ; Seung KB; Jang YS; Rha SW; Bae JH; Kim SS; Park SJ;
    J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(1):377-382. PubMed ID: 27720323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Percutaneous Intervention for Myocardial Infarction After Noncardiac Surgery: Patient Characteristics and Outcomes.
    Parashar A; Agarwal S; Krishnaswamy A; Sud K; Poddar KL; Bassi M; Ellis S; Tuzcu EM; Menon V; Kapadia SR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2016 Jul; 68(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 27443427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. [Efficacy comparison of primary percutaneous coronary intervention by drug-coated balloon angioplasty or drug-eluting stenting in acute myocardial infarction patients with de novo coronary lesions].
    Zhang DP; Wang LF; Liu Y; Li KB; Xu L; Li WM; Ni ZH; Xia K; Zhang ZY; Yang XC
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2020 Jul; 48(7):600-607. PubMed ID: 32842271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.